Richard writes:

In this review, we will look at the build quality, design, image quality of the Meike 3.5mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye lens. I’ve also done some head to head comparison with the Laowa 4mm f/2.8 Circular Fisheye lens and will share with you my results.

Peter Forsgård:

My favorite combo for the everyday shooting is E-M5 MKIII And 12-45mm F4.

Some fun via Camera Conspiracies:

The Olympus EM1 Mark III made a great mistake. We’ll do some tests to show it’s glory. This camera was not designed for video shooters at all, you can’t even save custom modes for video it’s all photography based. But there are some seriously good hidden aspects that make this one of the best video cameras I’ve ever used. With a simple firmware update, Olympus could really give Panasonic a run for it’s money for best video camera in micro four thirds loser land.

You may have forgotten this lens even exists :)

Peter Forsgård reviewed this lens:

And Also Matti Sulanto did the same:

The Tamron MFT zoom is in Stock at BHphoto in Black (Click here) and Silver (Click here).

Olympus 12-45mm PRO at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto, GetOlympus.

Lenstip tested the new Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-45 mm f/4.0 PRO lens and concludes:

Pros:

• solid, sealed casing,
• excellent image quality in the frame centre,
• good image quality on the edge of the frame up from the maximum relative aperture,
• moderate longitudinal chromatic aberration,
• low lateral chromatic aberration,
• sensible coma correction,
• slight astigmatism,
• quiet, fast, and accurate autofocus.

Cons:

• very high distortion on RAW files,
• noticeable vignetting on RAW files,
• performance against bright light should have been better.

Even though the cons list of the tested lens features as many as three positions, I still assess its performance very positively indeed. First of all it impressed me with excellent sharpness already from the maximum relative aperture. The task of Olympus optics specialists was very difficult and they managed to execute it exceedingly well. What about the flaws, then? Two of them are of a smaller calibre. A high distortion for RAW files is caused by a specific approach toward lenses in this system. It leaves distortion correction to software of a camera; in return you get more leeway when it comes to correction of other optical aberrations. Vignetting is noticeable but, compared to other standard zoom lenses of the Micro Four Thirds system, and also some instruments designed for bigger sensors, it still looks good. The only flaw that should be considered a serious slip-up of this lens and criticized more harshly is performance against bright light. I think the lens should have performed a lot better in this area

Panasonic GM5

Mapcamera posted a gorgeous set of images showing the new Voigtlander NOKTON 60mm f/0.95 lens mounted on different MTF cameras.

E-M1III

Panasonic GX7III

Pen-F

The new Voigtlander 60mm f/0,95 lens is in Stock at BHphoto.

Camera Conspiracies writes:

Canon EOS R with RF 15-35mm f2.8 vs Olympus EM1 Mark III with Leica 12mm f1.4. Now that Olympus has phase detection, is it as good as Canon’s dual pixel autofocus in video? There are levels to phase detection autofocus, some more polished than others. Can Canon compete with Olympus stabilization? Lens + digital vs IBIS + digital.