What’s better: digital or optical distortion correction? (dpreview)
Dpreview tried to found an answer to the following question: Can software ever take the place of optical excellence?
They tested four cameras: Canon Powershot S90, Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
, Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1
and the Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'ES')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1 }
if ($loc == 'IT')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1 }
if ($loc == 'AT')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'DE')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'BE')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1 }
if ($loc == 'AU')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'FR' OR $loc == 'FX')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'NL')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1 }
if ($loc == 'CA')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($loc == 'US')
{ $sel = "1"; ?>Olympus E-PL1
}
if ($sel != '1')
{?>Olympus E-PL1
} ?>.
And what did they discover? “Purely optically-corrected design have an edge over the Micro Four Thirds lens that combines both optical and digital correction.”
Interesting!
Read more on dpreview.




