<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trustedreview tests the Panasonic GF1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/trustedreview-tests-the-panasonic-gf1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/trustedreview-tests-the-panasonic-gf1/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug.nash</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/trustedreview-tests-the-panasonic-gf1/comment-page-1/#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>doug.nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=6534#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>Is there a forum here on this site? Sorry, if I missed that, but I can&#039;t find a link.

What&#039;s the story with the U.S. GF1 pricing - with the 20mm kit lens? 

Amazon is selling the same kit (according to the link on this site) for $1,599.99.

However, Panasonic&#039;s own website sells it for $899.95, plus free shipping. 

What in the world am I missing here???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a forum here on this site? Sorry, if I missed that, but I can&#8217;t find a link.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the story with the U.S. GF1 pricing &#8211; with the 20mm kit lens? </p>
<p>Amazon is selling the same kit (according to the link on this site) for $1,599.99.</p>
<p>However, Panasonic&#8217;s own website sells it for $899.95, plus free shipping. </p>
<p>What in the world am I missing here???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/trustedreview-tests-the-panasonic-gf1/comment-page-1/#comment-4344</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=6534#comment-4344</guid>
		<description>10/10 image quality? c&#039;mon..

Trusted review&#039;s also reviewed the e-p1, yet when i searched their website it seems they removed the E-P1 review..??? E-P1 has at the very least the same image quality as the gf1, IMO e-p1 has better IQ. Did the e-p1 get a 10/10 for image quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10/10 image quality? c&#8217;mon..</p>
<p>Trusted review&#8217;s also reviewed the e-p1, yet when i searched their website it seems they removed the E-P1 review..??? E-P1 has at the very least the same image quality as the gf1, IMO e-p1 has better IQ. Did the e-p1 get a 10/10 for image quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 446/470 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-11 22:13:52 -->
