<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triple Panasonic lens review at ePhotozine (14mm, 20mm and 14-42mm)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/comment-page-1/#comment-78893</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=26005#comment-78893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have both the Panny 20mm and the 14mm, and use an Olympus E-PL1.

The 14mm focusses way faster (and quieter), but I seem to have quite a bit of CA. Not sure if I got a lemon or something, cause every other review seems to say it&#039;s really good on that front.

Despite m4/3rds being a &#039;system&#039;, you&#039;d probably find in most cases the Panasonic cameras work better with the Panasonic lenses and Olympus cameras with Olympus lenses.

I&#039;m in the process of trying to convince my wife to let me get the 45mm f/1.8 for that very reason! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both the Panny 20mm and the 14mm, and use an Olympus E-PL1.</p>
<p>The 14mm focusses way faster (and quieter), but I seem to have quite a bit of CA. Not sure if I got a lemon or something, cause every other review seems to say it&#8217;s really good on that front.</p>
<p>Despite m4/3rds being a &#8216;system&#8217;, you&#8217;d probably find in most cases the Panasonic cameras work better with the Panasonic lenses and Olympus cameras with Olympus lenses.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the process of trying to convince my wife to let me get the 45mm f/1.8 for that very reason! <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Wolstenholme</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/comment-page-1/#comment-75837</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Wolstenholme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=26005#comment-75837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the 20mm is pretty much universally described as internal focusing:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasonic_Lumix_20mm_lens

I suppose if you wanted to be pedantic, you could describe it as a rear focusing design, but then all lens movements are still taking place within the lens.

Focusing was fast on the G3 I had to test the lens with. i suppose performance may vary in this area depending on which MFT body you use.

All the best

Gary]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 20mm is pretty much universally described as internal focusing:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasonic_Lumix_20mm_lens" rel="nofollow">http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasonic_Lumix_20mm_lens</a></p>
<p>I suppose if you wanted to be pedantic, you could describe it as a rear focusing design, but then all lens movements are still taking place within the lens.</p>
<p>Focusing was fast on the G3 I had to test the lens with. i suppose performance may vary in this area depending on which MFT body you use.</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someguy</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/comment-page-1/#comment-75831</link>
		<dc:creator>Someguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=26005#comment-75831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It says it was tested with the Panasonic Lumix G3 - Maybe this speeds up focusing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says it was tested with the Panasonic Lumix G3 &#8211; Maybe this speeds up focusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/comment-page-1/#comment-75707</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=26005#comment-75707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s interesting that they say the 20mm is internal focusing on the first line of the review. Did the reviewer even use this lens?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s interesting that they say the 20mm is internal focusing on the first line of the review. Did the reviewer even use this lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Reeee</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/triple-panasonic-lens-review-at-ephotozine-14mm-20mm-and-14-42mm/comment-page-1/#comment-75704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Reeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=26005#comment-75704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 20mm focusses fast on my GH2, although not as fast as the 14-140mm. I&#039;ve gotten some surprising shots just by hitting the shutter button by reflex and it kept up. In low light it&#039;s not very fast and will hunt a bit. AF+MF helps tremendously in those situations.

For me the 20mm&#039;s biggest advantage is the combination of size and IQ. If I&#039;m ever forced to buy another kit lens, I&#039;d certainly pick a 14mm over any 14-42mm zoom!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20mm focusses fast on my GH2, although not as fast as the 14-140mm. I&#8217;ve gotten some surprising shots just by hitting the shutter button by reflex and it kept up. In low light it&#8217;s not very fast and will hunt a bit. AF+MF helps tremendously in those situations.</p>
<p>For me the 20mm&#8217;s biggest advantage is the combination of size and IQ. If I&#8217;m ever forced to buy another kit lens, I&#8217;d certainly pick a 14mm over any 14-42mm zoom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 21/35 queries in 0.024 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 330/338 objects using apc

 Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2013-06-19 06:41:58 by W3 Total Cache -->