The need for speed: PEN-F Zuiko Olympus 42mm F/1.2

FacebookShare

It is not easy to find that lens on Ebay: The PEN-F Zuiko Olympus 42mm F/1.2. You can find some image samples on flickr

Short Movie “true love” Lumix GH1 with PEN F 42mm lensPEN F 42mm lens:

FacebookShare
  • spanky

    Nice lens, no doubt, but IMO not worth the prices it’s selling for on eBay or elsewhere. Just because it’s rare doesn’t make it 5 times better than a comparable lens like the Canon FL 55/1.2. Great for collectors, not so great for photographers.

  • bilgy_no1

    Olympus: please redesign this lens for m4/3.

  • Spiny Norman

    @Spanky — the Pen lens is optimized for half-frame 35mm coverage and as such it would have been much easier to deal with the various optical artifacts. For this reason it’s a good bet that on a densely-packed 4/3 sensor the Olympus lens would blow the Canon out of the water.

    @bilgy — YES PLEASE, OLYMPUS!!! WE WANT THE WHOLE SET OF PEN LENS EQUIVALENTS IN ยต4/3!!!

  • spanky

    @Spiny – If you’re going to make such sweeping and categorical statements, I’ll ask you to prove them. The fact is that I look at photos taken with the PEN 42/1.2 and compare them to photos taken with the Canon FL 55/1.2 on my GH1, and I see absolutely no difference. You’re trying to generalize based on some pseudo science, I’m looking at facts. Nothing I’ve seen in photographs justifies the premium which this lens demands on eBay. It’s expensive because there’s not a lot of them on the market, not because it’s a 5-times better lens.

  • WT21

    I don’t know this lens at all, but judging from the linked picture stream, the bokeh looks horrible. The lens sold for $1,000! An MF lens with terrible bokeh for $1,000? Some people have too much money, lol!

  • Spiny Norman

    All else being equal, of course! And of course, all else is rarely equal. Nevertheless, it is the case that an equivalent small-format lens generally out-resolves a comparable large-format lens in terms of *absolute* resolution — lp/mm on film or sensor (not lp/total image height).

    It’s quite well-understood that it is exceedingly difficult to maintain absolute resolution as the diameter of the image circle is increased. Conversely, lenses with small image circles generally have higher absolute resolution. For example, lenses on old Minox cameras are among the sharpest consumer lenses ever produced (again, in terms of lp/mm on film).

    Within a format, speed, and focal length, of course, there can be great variation dependent on design, construction tolerances, and — of course — sample variation.

    Nowhere do I say that the old PEN lenses are worth the EBay prices. That would be silly.

  • Chris

    @WT21 – Where there is pinpoint and brutal sharpness, there is usually bad bokeh. That’s because smooth bokeh is caused by spherical aberration, something that is usually corrected in order to gain sharpness. The sharpness is apparent in many of the photos, as well as the outstanding color rendition.

    This lens would be a landscape/street photographer’s dream, but a portrait photographer’s nightmare.

  • WT21

    Chris — then why the 1.2? What landscape shooter shots 1.2? I don’t do street photography, but my understanding is that you want a wide dof, and you go off certain focal principals that generally do not include 1.2 as an aperture, no?

    Also, I always thought of landscape as using something a bit wider than an 84mm equivalence in terms of FOV.

  • I just got an adaptor for this lens, got the actual lens sometime last year for 300 bucks from ebay. heres some sample pics http://www.flickr.com/photos/leadsalad/

  • Steve

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

What are Cookies?
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that is stored in a temporary location on your computer to allow our website to distinguish you from other users of the website. If you don't want to accept cookies, you'll still be able to browse the site and use it for research purposes. Most web browsers have cookies enabled, but at the bottom of this page you can see how to disable cookies. Please note that cookies can't harm your computer. We don't store personally identifiable information in the cookies, but we do use encrypted information gathered from them to help provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allow us to improve our site. You can watch a simple video from Google to find more information about cookies.

Cookies used by our Website
The 43rumors website, 43rumors.com, uses the following cookies for the collection of website usage statistics and to ensure that we can . These are anonymous and temporary. By using our website, you agree that we may place these types of cookies on your device.
Read how Google uses data when you use our partners' sites or apps: http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/partners/
Google Analytics Cookie Usage on Websites: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/cookie-usage?csw=1#cookiesSet Addthis cookies: http://www.addthis.com/privacy.
Disqus cookies: https://help.disqus.com/customer/portal/articles/466235-use-of-cookies.
Vimeo cookies: http://vimeo.com/privacy.
Youtube cookies: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en-GB

Disabling/Enabling Cookies
You have the ability to accept or decline cookies by modifying the settings in your browser. Please note however that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our site. For information about how to disable cookies in your browser please visit the About Cookies website.

Close