<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Panasonic 25mm f/1.4 image samples&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/some-panasonic-25mm-f1-4-image-samples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/some-panasonic-25mm-f1-4-image-samples/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/some-panasonic-25mm-f1-4-image-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-9633</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=7214#comment-9633</guid>
		<description>A good review can be found here:

http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?test=obiektywu&amp;test_ob=173</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good review can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?test=obiektywu&#038;test_ob=173" rel="nofollow">http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?test=obiektywu&#038;test_ob=173</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger 9</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/some-panasonic-25mm-f1-4-image-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=7214#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>&quot;The absolutely perfect low-light lens&quot;? A few months ago, no question. Now? Micro Four Thirds users, at least, need to be evaluating whether it&#039;s more &quot;perfect&quot; than Panasonic&#039;s 20mm f/1.7 -- which isn&#039;t much slower, isn&#039;t much wider, is vastly more compact, seems to be a stellar performer, and is less than half the price.

I&#039;d love to see a practical comparison between these two -- including such factors as focusing speed.

Of course, what I&#039;d love even more would be to see a wider selection of fixed-focal-length lenses for µ4/3 with apertures of f/2 or faster (hellooooo, Olympus, anybody home?!? And where are you, Mister Sigma?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The absolutely perfect low-light lens&#8221;? A few months ago, no question. Now? Micro Four Thirds users, at least, need to be evaluating whether it&#8217;s more &#8220;perfect&#8221; than Panasonic&#8217;s 20mm f/1.7 &#8212; which isn&#8217;t much slower, isn&#8217;t much wider, is vastly more compact, seems to be a stellar performer, and is less than half the price.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a practical comparison between these two &#8212; including such factors as focusing speed.</p>
<p>Of course, what I&#8217;d love even more would be to see a wider selection of fixed-focal-length lenses for µ4/3 with apertures of f/2 or faster (hellooooo, Olympus, anybody home?!? And where are you, Mister Sigma?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 446/454 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 02:56:22 -->
