Small Cameras, Big Sensors (The New York Times talks about Micro Four Thirds)
-
David Pogue from the New York Times (Click here) wrote an article about the new Micro Four Thirds revolution: “for years, there were two kinds of cameras: pocket models, with tiny sensors that produce blurry or grainy photos in low light and S.L.R. cameras, those big-sensor, big-body, heavy black beasts used by professionals. In the last couple of years, though, things have changed. There’s a new class of camera whose size (both body and sensor) falls in between those two time-honored extremes. They represent a rethinking of every single design element, a jettisoning of every nonessential component, in pursuit of a tiny, big-sensor camera. Because that, after all, is what the world really wants.”
Inside the article he focuses on two m43 cameras the Panasonic GF2 and the Olympus E-PL2: “In the end, you can’t really cheat physics. Getting cameras this small means sacrifices. For example, both of these cameras have a pop-up flash — and it pops way up high, a trick that minimizes red eye in your subjects — but it’s weak, with only about a six-foot range.” and “The bigger loss is the optical viewfinder. Both cameras have bright, beautiful three-inch screens that do O.K. in sunlight. But they’re nowhere near as good as the eyepiece of a regular S.L.R., especially in low light. The difference in clarity and feeling is especially evident when you compare one of these Micro Four-Thirds cameras with an S.L.R. side-by-side.”
But despite the sacrifices you have to make: “These miniature Micro Four-Thirds cameras cost as much as a real S.L.R., and they teem with compromises. Still, if the world craves a solution to the small camera/big sensor challenge, these models offer some novel solutions to the puzzle.”
Like David I do believe the need for “mirrorless” (or I should say the need for compact cameras with image high quality) will increase and the competition will become bigger and bigger. Let’s see how Panasonic and Olympus will exploit the momentum to gain more market shares.
Check the current Panasonic GF2 price at Amazon, Adorama, B&H, J&R, eBay.
Check the current Olympus E-PL2 price at Amazon, Adorama, B&H, J&R, eBay.

Soeren Engelbrecht
2 years ago |I like this particular quote: “…a jettisoning of every nonessential component”. So, according to this line of thought: Which of these components do you consider “essential”:
a) Pet and Food modes
b) The ability to store the birthday of your children
c) A built-in viewfinder
Apparently, only (a) and (b) are essential to photography these days…
TheVoiceoverman
2 years ago |a) and b) don’t affect the size and weight of the camera
Duarte Bruno
2 years ago |“But they’re nowhere near as good as the eyepiece of a regular S.L.R., especially in low light.”
What have I missed? OVFs are worthless in low light compared to any kind of gained LCD/EVF. I wonder if he ever used a SLR at all.
admin
2 years ago |I was also wondering about that part of the article. OVF sucks in low light.
twoomy
2 years ago |And the EVF on my GH2 is about 100 times more useful than LiveView on my D300 in low light.
marsupial2go
2 years ago |Mr. Pogue said some nice things about the image quality in stills and video. However, I don’t know why he had a problem with that lens (14/2.5) in low light. That’s a fairly fast lens.
A.
2 years ago |Admin, it looks like some 3 days ago you decided to play again with the layout of the site…
The same is valid for X-rumours, K-rumours and Mirrorless rumours.
admin
2 years ago |It’s not me it’s the designer. He tried to fix the issues with the new IE9 browser. SHould be fixed now…or not?
Slava
2 years ago |What I don’t understand, why it’s not possible to make small cameras with bigger sensor.
All analog cameras were Full Frame, not even APS. Look at Leicas, Contax, Nikon S and other interchangeable lense cameras…
Mr. Reeee
2 years ago |Exactly! I never understood exactly WHY full-frame DSLRs have to be so huge.
Is it some macho engineering slide rule minded imperative? The school of thought where “If it’s not difficult, complex and unpleasant, it’s not valid”?
Remember the Rollei 35? Great camera! TINY camera! A climbing buddy carried one and it was fantastic.
A.
2 years ago |No, it’s not. It’s horrible with Firefox 4.
Le me take an ironical tone, please: does the designer test his work on multiple browsers? Apparently not, from what I see.
TheVoiceoverman
2 years ago |6ft range for the flash? Rubbish.
SteveD
2 years ago |It’s an honest assessment but on the harsh side. I don’t think the problem is so much the lack of an “optical” viewfinder” as an “eye level” viewfinder. I was fine composing with my E-PL1′s LCD with normal or WA lenses, but 150+ mm and legacy MF glass made me buy the VF-2.
SteveD
2 years ago |BTW, the new site doesn’t work well at all in Chrome. The framing goes away for some reason.
admin
2 years ago |Hi Steve! try to reload the website. it should fix the problem. I am using Chrome on MAC and it works!
GreyOwl
2 years ago |Chrome 12 works OK on Windows 7, as does IE9 (a part from some problems the other day).The sites also display OK on Firefox 4 and Opera 11.01 and Opera 11.10 beta (All on Windows 7 SP1).
safaridon
2 years ago |Curious why in the picture is the GF2 shown as larger than the EPL2 when it is actually smaller? Would have been more appropriate perhaps to have shown the two along with typical big DSLR!
Pogue obviously has his preference of DSLRs over smaller m4/3 systems and fails to see how well they compliment each other or have special advantages of their own.
The analogy I would bring as to why people are so enamored by these small ILS is why do people like the small metal car or train models that last forever and ever over the bigger cheaper crushable bigger plastic ones that take up so much space and bulky to put in your pocket? It is the perceived higher quality of construction, fit and durabiity of the all metal bodies in the case of GF1/2, EP5, and clad EP1/2. If you look for an all metal bodied DSLR that may cost you up to twice as much or somewhere between $1200-$1800 in basic kit form? Granted the smaller ILS do not come cheap either especially once you add an EVF to the mix for comparison.
As to the comment about the underpowered tiny flashes well ISO 100 rating of 6 feet mean just that, ie using ISO 400 that most use the flash range extends to 12 feet or more? Also on the GF2 and EPL2 these flashes are can be bounced. With better high ISO these days and special HDRF modes and fast small primes where is less and less need to use a flash in the first place with these cameras and you have hotshoe mount for optional larger flashes if needed for portrait work.
In regards to the advantages of having an OVF the author fails to note that these vary a lot. First you have the very tiny OVFs as found on G12 and other compacts which are very small and tunnel vision and most reviews note as next to worthless. Then you have the dimmer small cheaper pentamirror OVF found on all entry DSLRs and some prosumer ones with only the expensive prosumer ones having a brighter and larger pentaprism viewfinders. The pentamirror models are most 0.4X power showing only 95% of your picture while most APS-C pentaprism are 0.5X power and 95-100% view. In contrast the EPL2 has an optional high resolution EVF with 0.7X magnification and 100% view equal in view to the largest FF DSLR OVF and even the lower resolution smaller optional EVF for GF2 has 0.5X magnification and 100% view. Sure the OVFs have advantages as you see the clear view continuously with no blackouts but as others noted in low light etc the EVF with ability to gain up the light are advantageous.
Of course the author failed to make any mention of the substantially smaller size of the m4/3 lenses other then to note there were fewer of them available for choice.
One of the most important advantages for now the author failed to note is the better and faster contrast AF live view with m4/3 compared to the slow live view on majority of DSLRs for video with few exceptions the D7000, K5, and recent Sonys like A55. Another very important overlooked feature is the overheating of the larger sensors limits most of the DSLRs to HD video clips of at most 12 minutes to 20 minutes compared to 30 min to 1 hr on the m4/3 at least on the Panys without IBIS?
I have a GF1 with 20mm lens and am smitten with it even though I have and use a DSLR as well.
PEN
2 years ago |Pogue’s article is all about the smaller mFT bodies and conveniently ignores Panasonic’s G and GH-series that address some of the “compromises.” He also dumbs down the discussion to fit the short article when talking about things like mirrorless design, low light, pancake lenses, flash and video. Still, it’s nice to get mainstream press for mFT. It must be a NY Times policy to put periods in S.L.R. which just looks wrong.