<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic shows his future MicroFourThirds lenses at CES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/panasonic-shows-his-future-microfourthirds-lenses-at-ces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/panasonic-shows-his-future-microfourthirds-lenses-at-ces/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/panasonic-shows-his-future-microfourthirds-lenses-at-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9314#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>Cannot wait for the 100-300! If there is one lens that I am ready to pay premium price, that has got to be it. 600mm on such small package, thats awesome!

As for the other two...
the fisheye might be a cheaper ticket to wide angles than the prohibitive 7-14. Will have to see.
As for the 2.8/14, I am sorry, I just don&#039;t get it. Meerly half a stop faster than the kit lens won&#039;t make it a low light champion. For the compromise, you get no OIS. I could have used a bit more bulk and at least f2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot wait for the 100-300! If there is one lens that I am ready to pay premium price, that has got to be it. 600mm on such small package, thats awesome!</p>
<p>As for the other two&#8230;<br />
the fisheye might be a cheaper ticket to wide angles than the prohibitive 7-14. Will have to see.<br />
As for the 2.8/14, I am sorry, I just don&#8217;t get it. Meerly half a stop faster than the kit lens won&#8217;t make it a low light champion. For the compromise, you get no OIS. I could have used a bit more bulk and at least f2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AltraOttica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goodmorning 11.10.2010</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/panasonic-shows-his-future-microfourthirds-lenses-at-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-6597</link>
		<dc:creator>AltraOttica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goodmorning 11.10.2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9314#comment-6597</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic ha presentato diverse nuove lenti per il formato micro-QuattroTerzi, dedicate dunque ai propri modelli GF1 e GH1. Gli obiettivi presentati e che arriveranno sul mercato nei prossimi mesi sono un tele-zoom 100-300 mm f/4.0-5.6, non molto luminoso ma che rappresenta comunque la prima lente di questo tipo specifica per la baionetta micro-QuattroTerzi, un nuovo obiettivo pancacke da 14mm, quindi molto compatto e discreto, ed infine un inedito grandangolo fisheye 8mm f/3.5, con elementi ottici asferici. Sembra dunque che gli investimenti su questo settore, fin&#8217;ora di nicchia, comincino a farsi rilevanti. Certamente, la grande risposta che il mercato ha dato su questo formato non poteva certo passare inosservata. Speriamo solo che queste ottiche possano vantare una buona qualità ottica anche senza correzioni di tipo digitale. [A.B.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic ha presentato diverse nuove lenti per il formato micro-QuattroTerzi, dedicate dunque ai propri modelli GF1 e GH1. Gli obiettivi presentati e che arriveranno sul mercato nei prossimi mesi sono un tele-zoom 100-300 mm f/4.0-5.6, non molto luminoso ma che rappresenta comunque la prima lente di questo tipo specifica per la baionetta micro-QuattroTerzi, un nuovo obiettivo pancacke da 14mm, quindi molto compatto e discreto, ed infine un inedito grandangolo fisheye 8mm f/3.5, con elementi ottici asferici. Sembra dunque che gli investimenti su questo settore, fin&#8217;ora di nicchia, comincino a farsi rilevanti. Certamente, la grande risposta che il mercato ha dato su questo formato non poteva certo passare inosservata. Speriamo solo che queste ottiche possano vantare una buona qualità ottica anche senza correzioni di tipo digitale. [A.B.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernhard</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/panasonic-shows-his-future-microfourthirds-lenses-at-ces/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9314#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>Why again 14mm ??? I really get bored of 14mm as nearly every Olympus/Panasonic zoom starts with 14mm !! 11 or 12mm would make sense to me and also could be interesting as additional lens for those who normally prefer a zoom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why again 14mm ??? I really get bored of 14mm as nearly every Olympus/Panasonic zoom starts with 14mm !! 11 or 12mm would make sense to me and also could be interesting as additional lens for those who normally prefer a zoom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 490/516 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 05:34:32 -->
