March 22, 2015
Posted in news

Weekly 43rumors readers pictures roundup.

Share


Ouria Tadmor

1) You can share your pics by using the message box on our 43rumors Facebook page (Click here).
2) All 43rumors readers pictures can be seen here: facebook.com/43rumors/photos. Like the pictures you like and chat with the authors if you want to know how they took the shot!
3) The most liked pictures and some pics selected by myself will be posted weekly on 43rumors

This is the weekly selection:
Read the rest of this entry →

March 21, 2015
Posted in deals

Olympus sells first ref. 40-150mm PRO lenses for $300 less.

Bildschirmfoto 2015-03-21 um 12.24.50

The very first refurbished 40-150mm PRO lenses are for sale with a $300 discount at GetOlympus (Click here).

Olympus lens savings:
$100 off on the 12mm f/2.0 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 75mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 45mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$80 off on the 40-150mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 14-42mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 75-300mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 12-40mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 60mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.

March 21, 2015
Posted in reviews

Using the Olympus E-M5 Mk II as a film ‘scanner’ (Guest Post by JL Williams).

Using the Olympus E-M5 Mk II as a film ‘scanner’
by JL Williams (jlwilliams-us.tumblr.com)

If you’re a long-time photographer (like me) you may have lots of old (and not-so-old) film negatives that you’d like to bring into the digital age. But if you’re an impatient photographer (like me) you probably haven’t made much progress!

That’s because scanning negatives into digital files has always been a PITA, no matter how you do it. Sure, you can farm the job out, if you don’t mind sending irreplaceable negatives off to parts unknown. Or you can buy a scanner and do it yourself… but cheap scanners produce, well, cheap results. Better scanners are slow, inconvenient, and require a lot of post-scan touchup — especially if you’re scanning silver-based black-and-white film, which defeats the “auto-fix” routines that many scanners promise.

(Quick explanation of why: color neg and slide films, by design, transmit infrared light, so they won’t heat up during enlargement or projection. That lets the scanner distinguish between a small detail and a small chunk of dirt on the neg… a small detail will transmit IR, but a chunk of dirt won’t. Silver-based films, on the other hand, block infrared, so the scanner can’t tell details from dirt.)

So when the Olympus E-M 5 Mk II camera was announced, with its clever sensor-shifting “high res shot” mode, plenty of us wondered if we could use this feature to get 40-megapixel JPEGs (or 64-megapixel raw files) of film negatives. For many types of subjects, high res shot mode is pretty limited, because it requires the subject to be absolutely motionless during its eight-exposure cycle — but that shouldn’t be a problem when copying negatives, right?

So I tried it. Here’s what I found:

Building the Rig

scan_rig-700px

I decided to test using a medium-format black-and-white negative, since these are capable of excellent digital quality but are often problematic to scan.

Building a rig to photograph these negs with the E-M 5 Mk II would have been easy if I owned a macro lens — but I don’t, and I didn’t intend to buy one until I was sure this process would work! So instead I had to cobble together a macro setup using some inexpensive, generic, non-coupled extensions tubes I happened to have. Even the shortest extension available with these tubes was too long to cover a full 6x6cm negative with most of my lenses; the only one that would work was my 75mm f/1.8 Olympus, an excellent lens for general photography, but not necessarily ideal for macro shooting.

Another problem was that since my extension tubes aren’t coupled electronically to the camera, I couldn’t just set the lens to my desired aperture and focusing distance. Instead I had to resort to an old trick: mount the lens directly on a camera, use the manual focus and DOF preview to get the settings I wanted, and then immediately remove the lens without turning off the camera. This trick let me mount the lens on the extension tubes without losing my previous settings.

I mounted the camera on an old-fashioned copy stand I happened to own, and the photo part of the setup was done.

For illuminating the negs, I had the idea of using my iPad. Sure, there are lots of less expensive and probably brighter ways to do this, but I already had the iPad, and it can generate a large area of bright, even light. Several free apps are available for turning it into a lightbox; I used one called Leuchtpult LT.

I placed my test film into the medium-format film holder that had come with my scanner, and laid it on top of the iPad. Problem: the distance between the film and the iPad was so short that the iPad’s individual LEDs were within the plane of focus, causing a grid pattern to appear behind the image.

Solution: I put a translucent plastic refrigerator container on top of the iPad, and laid the film holder across that. Sounds crude, I know, but it worked perfectly! The plastic container separated the film enough from the iPad that no patterns were visible. And unlike a flatbed scanner, this setup leaves absolutely NO glass surfaces near the film plane — so, far fewer dust and cleaning headaches.

Shooting the Tests

‘Scanning’ with the camera

To test the setup, I chose a black-and-white negative I had made in 1993, using a Bronica 645 camera. It showed the members of the Ballet Omaha dance company perched on a Union Pacific “Big Boy” locomotive (long story…) and contained a wide range of tones and lots of detail.

93-09-01_07-700px

I focused the E-M5 Mk II on the negative using its 10x magnified critical focusing view and the swiveling LCD viewfinder. Focusing on the grain structure of the film was easy at this magnification. I adjusted the exposure by using the viewfinder’s “blinkies” feature, which highlights over- or under-exposed areas, picking a midrange value that avoided blinkies at either extreme.

The Mk II’s high res shot mode requires the camera to be very still, and I really should have used a remote release to trigger it. I didn’t have one handy, so instead I set the camera to wait 8 seconds before starting the high res shot sequence. After the 8-second delay was up, it took the camera only a few seconds to make and assemble the high res shot. Since high res shots use the electronic rather than the mechanical shutter, the process was eerily silent.

I had chosen the raw+JPEG option, so I came away with both a 16.7mb JPEG file and a 104.5mb Olympus ORF raw file. I opened the raw file in Adobe Photoshop CC 2014, using Olympus’ recently-released High Res Shot Raw File plug-in.

Comparison scan with a flatbed scanner

After making the camera shot, I transferred the film holder to my Canon 8800F flatbed scanner and launched Hamrick Software’s Vuescan to perform a scan. I used the scanner’s full 4800-pixel-per-inch resolution setting and saved a 179mb TIFF file.

To compare the two images on an equal basis, I downsampled the scanner image to match the camera’s 6560-pixel width. This left me with two approximately-61-megapixel images to compare.

I didn’t spend much time optimizing the highlight and shadow values, since at this stage I was mostly interested in detail and sharpness. Both images had plenty of latitude for adjustment, and I’m sure I could have gotten similar tonal ranges from both.

The results

Let’s have some fun: Instead of telling you my conclusions first, I’ll show you the images and then reveal which came from where. Both are pixel-for-pixel crops of the locomotive’s number plate:

Image A

scan_detail-camera

Image B

scan_detail-scanner

So, what do you think?

Would you be surprised to know that Image A came from the E-M 5 Mk II? It did!

Even with my improvised copying setup and non-optimized, non-macro lens, the camera copy (to my eyes) yielded a much sharper-looking, more-detailed result than the scanner copy.

What’s more, the full-size camera image had much less dust and required much less cleanup than the scanner image. That won’t surprise darkroom old-timers: a scanner shines a concentrated beam of light through the film, much like a condenser enlarger — and condenser enlargers were notorious for exaggerating dust, grain, and scratches. My copy stand rig, with its wide, diffuse light source, was more like printing with a diffusion enlarger — much more forgiving of negative defects.

The time difference was striking as well. I could clean, position, and expose a negative in the copy stand in less than 30 seconds, while the scanner took more than six minutes exclusive of prep. If you’re scanning all the frames on a 12-exposure roll (for example) that’s the difference between a 10-minute job and more than an hour of labor.

Of course I’m sure there are better, faster scanners than my Canon 8800F — and if you have one of them, good for you. But if you have an “average” scanner like mine, and if you’ve been considering the E-M 5 Mk II, the ability to make high-quality ‘scans’ with it is a nice additional bonus to take into consideration when deciding whether or not to buy.

E-M5II store links:
E-M5II in Black at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
E-M5II in Silver at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
E-M5II In Europe at AmazonUK, Jessops, WexUK, Namencolor.

 

March 21, 2015
Posted in news

A bit of everything…

Emeric: This is my latest short film shot with Panasonic GH4 and the SLR Anamorphot x1,33

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II review at Techradar.
Olympus EM5 Mark II, Lone Pine and Mt Whitney (Diglloyd).
Selfie contest to win the E-Pl7 at Fotopus.
E-M5II – Sternenlicht-Modus (Pen And Tell).
CM1 test at DC.watch.
KOWA Prominar 8.5mm F2.8 image samples at Mapcamera.
E-M5II test at Fengniao.

Anonymous:The E-M5 plus 12-40mm f/2.8 together can be bought for less than US$900 in Australia. (Amazon price at this time is $999 for the lens alone). Details here. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55431611

Jetomr:The latest update from DXO Optics Pro 10 (10.3) is now able to workshop with Oly E-PL7 RAW files. Mostly of the common body-lenses profiles are also packed in.

Shaun:I created this commercial video for a Veterinary College using the Lumix GH4, the GH3, and a collection of Micro 4/3 Lenses from Lumix and Olympus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZIMzsDOtWY

 

March 20, 2015
Posted in deals

Red Refurbished E-PM2 with kit lens for $249.

red_epm2
This is the cheapest Olympus 16MP sensor camera yet: The Red Refurbished E-Pm2 with kit lens sells for $249 only at GetOlympus (Click here). A list of all Refurbished OMD and PEN cameras can be found here.

Those are the current three Olympus-Panasonic deals listed at Amazon US:
Save Big on Select Panasonic Camera Products (Click here).
$200 Off the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mirrorless Camera (Click here).
Save $200 on the M. Zuiko 12-40mm Pro Lens w/ Purchase of the Olympus E-M5II (Click here).

Olympus lens savings:
$100 off on the 12mm f/2.0 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 75mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 45mm f/1.8 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$80 off on the 40-150mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 14-42mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 75-300mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$100 off on the 12-40mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.
$50 off on the 60mm lens at Amazon, Adorama, BHphoto and GetOlympus.

Share News and Rumors

Click on the Share button below to write the message! Name and email are NOT required so you can stay anonymous. Also the IP-address will not be submitted to us. Use Imageshack to share pictures (anonymously).

Your name (not required)

Email (not required)

Rumor

×
×