<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leica will not join MicroFourThirds (via Steve Huff)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/once-again-leica-will-not-join-microfourthirds-via-steve-huff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/once-again-leica-will-not-join-microfourthirds-via-steve-huff/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazal Majid</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/once-again-leica-will-not-join-microfourthirds-via-steve-huff/comment-page-1/#comment-12028</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazal Majid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=13074#comment-12028</guid>
		<description>Leica determined that the market for m4/3 is enthusiasts looking for high quality in a compact package, and thus the increase in bulk from an interchangeable mount is not worth it and the way to go is the X1. I never use any other lens that the 20mm pancake on my GF1, and if the X1 had better AF, I would probably have gotten one myself. Comparing the M9 to a m4/3 camera is of course completely ridiculous. As for image quality, neither m4/3 nor the M9 perform adequately at ISO 1600 and higher compared to full-frame and even APS-C DSLRs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leica determined that the market for m4/3 is enthusiasts looking for high quality in a compact package, and thus the increase in bulk from an interchangeable mount is not worth it and the way to go is the X1. I never use any other lens that the 20mm pancake on my GF1, and if the X1 had better AF, I would probably have gotten one myself. Comparing the M9 to a m4/3 camera is of course completely ridiculous. As for image quality, neither m4/3 nor the M9 perform adequately at ISO 1600 and higher compared to full-frame and even APS-C DSLRs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/once-again-leica-will-not-join-microfourthirds-via-steve-huff/comment-page-1/#comment-11974</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 08:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=13074#comment-11974</guid>
		<description>I think, when &quot; met ... from Leica on a party &quot; is not anymore possible because The S2 system costed a lot of money and does not bring in any, and if the Leica managers will be starving, then Leica will rebrand a m4/3 camera, paint the red dot on it, make a small firmware change and sell the leica version for the double price, to be able to go to parties again, and this might work ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, when &#8221; met &#8230; from Leica on a party &#8221; is not anymore possible because The S2 system costed a lot of money and does not bring in any, and if the Leica managers will be starving, then Leica will rebrand a m4/3 camera, paint the red dot on it, make a small firmware change and sell the leica version for the double price, to be able to go to parties again, and this might work <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/once-again-leica-will-not-join-microfourthirds-via-steve-huff/comment-page-1/#comment-11904</link>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=13074#comment-11904</guid>
		<description>Hi  
I think Leica has ordered a 4/3 sensor to Kodak to study a new m4/3 campera 
because Kodak has  developed a new 8.8MP 4/3 sensor and Leica use only Kodak CCD Sensor with the same CCD fotodiode dimension. 

The quality directly depending from sensor dimension is only a commercial boutade   to   push FF M9 sensor or S2 sensor. 
because the Kodak sensor photodiode has the same dimension in 4/3 sensor and in S2 Sensor. 
bye ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I think Leica has ordered a 4/3 sensor to Kodak to study a new m4/3 campera<br />
because Kodak has  developed a new 8.8MP 4/3 sensor and Leica use only Kodak CCD Sensor with the same CCD fotodiode dimension. </p>
<p>The quality directly depending from sensor dimension is only a commercial boutade   to   push FF M9 sensor or S2 sensor.<br />
because the Kodak sensor photodiode has the same dimension in 4/3 sensor and in S2 Sensor.<br />
bye <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 497/525 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 09:43:14 -->
