http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/ Panasonic and Olympus Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:57:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-1052 Olympus Pen E-P1規格極秘流出 » camcamday.com Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:30:32 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-1052 [...] [來源：4/3 rumors.com] [...] [...] [來源：4/3 rumors.com] [...]

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-1023 admin Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:15:08 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-1023 I do not believe the LCD will swivel. No chance... I do not believe the LCD will swivel. No chance…

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-1019 kiva Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:01:35 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-1019 Traciatim, well if it was a film to peel it of, as you say, we wouldnt see it on the image would we? i mean that the film you say it is would be too tightly sticked to the screen right? however in the image if you look closely its obvious that there is space between the plastic and the lcd - an air pocket if you like. dont you think so? look at the image again, and tell me what you think? Traciatim, well if it was a film to peel it of, as you say, we wouldnt see it on the image would we? i mean that the film you say it is would be too tightly sticked to the screen right? however in the image if you look closely its obvious that there is space between the plastic and the lcd – an air pocket if you like. dont you think so? look at the image again, and tell me what you think?

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-1016 Bido Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:46:35 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-1016 For "expert" this camera must be black, and must have a digital or optical usable VIEWFINDER I hope it will be the case ... For “expert” this camera must be black, and must have a digital or optical usable VIEWFINDER
I hope it will be the case …

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-1006 kiva Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:26:16 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-1006 guys? please look at the image of the e-p1 top plate. there is a plastic bag covering the lcd screen, right? what i want to say that the plastic bag must hook up to something to hold on. and the only thing i could think of is if the screen detaches from the body - swivel screen that gets into the bag like a hand fits in a glove. what do you think? could it be it? i really hope so.... guys? please look at the image of the e-p1 top plate. there is a plastic bag covering the lcd screen, right? what i want to say that the plastic bag must hook up to something to hold on. and the only thing i could think of is if the screen detaches from the body – swivel screen that gets into the bag like a hand fits in a glove. what do you think? could it be it? i really hope so….

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-838 Forester Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:03:52 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-838 Most SLR systems have a cheap fast prime lens. usually a 50mm f1.8 for $90. yes it's made of all plastic, but it takes great pictures. I hope Oly announces a comparable lens. My big complaint is the camera price. You can easily get a sensor that is much bigger for a lot cheaper. I believe their reasoning is based on the Video feature... not build quality. E-P1 with 720p for $1000. GH1 with 1080p is $1500!!! I think they are wrong, but this is where they are getting the idea. Most SLR systems have a cheap fast prime lens. usually a 50mm f1.8 for $90. yes it’s made of all plastic, but it takes great pictures. I hope Oly announces a comparable lens.
My big complaint is the camera price. You can easily get a sensor that is much bigger for a lot cheaper. I believe their reasoning is based on the Video feature… not build quality. E-P1 with 720p for $1000. GH1 with 1080p is $1500!!! I think they are wrong, but this is where they are getting the idea.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-833 Chris Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:53:48 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-833 Yes, I understand there's no faster 17. But let's talk about focal length equivalents, because that's what matters to the photographer. A 17 on M4/3 is a 34mm EFL. Canon has a 35/1.4 (very expensive), but also a 35/2 (very affordable). The idea, as far as I understood it, was that M4/3 offered the potential for smaller and equally fast lenses to APS-C. That does not appear to be happening. Yes, I understand there’s no faster 17. But let’s talk about focal length equivalents, because that’s what matters to the photographer. A 17 on M4/3 is a 34mm EFL. Canon has a 35/1.4 (very expensive), but also a 35/2 (very affordable). The idea, as far as I understood it, was that M4/3 offered the potential for smaller and equally fast lenses to APS-C. That does not appear to be happening.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-832 morgan Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:21:36 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-832 2.8 is a little slow, but I'm having trouble thinking of other 17mm (or similar) lenses of any mount that are faster. Zeiss has a 15/2.8 but it's like $3500. Leica has the 21/1.4 summilux which is 5kish. So maybe a 17/2.8 is the best price/performance they can do, which leaves a lot of room for say CV to do a faster wide angle lens. 2.8 is a little slow, but I’m having trouble thinking of other 17mm (or similar) lenses of any mount that are faster. Zeiss has a 15/2.8 but it’s like $3500. Leica has the 21/1.4 summilux which is 5kish. So maybe a 17/2.8 is the best price/performance they can do, which leaves a lot of room for say CV to do a faster wide angle lens.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-831 Joachim Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:20:00 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-831 Frosti7 wishes that the zoom 14-42 mm is redesigned to make it smaller. Possibly a 20-35 mm lens? I would like it. -- Chris wishes instead of the 2,8/17 mm a (small) faster lens: Okay, Panasonic announced a 1,7/20 mm (which of course must be compatible). -- If external optical viewfinders are offered, they should not be too bulky, but for instance collapsible. Frosti7 wishes that the zoom 14-42 mm is redesigned to make it smaller. Possibly a 20-35 mm lens? I would like it. — Chris wishes instead of the 2,8/17 mm a (small) faster lens: Okay, Panasonic announced a 1,7/20 mm (which of course must be compatible). — If external optical viewfinders are offered, they should not be too bulky, but for instance collapsible.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-826 Frosti7 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 10:48:45 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-826 Dylan,Agent00soul, It sounds logical and i hope you'll be right! It would be nice if olympus could redesign 14-42 lens and make it smaller then the current offering Dylan,Agent00soul,
It sounds logical and i hope you’ll be right!
It would be nice if olympus could redesign 14-42 lens and make it smaller then the current offering

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/olympus-pen-e-p1/comment-page-1/#comment-820 Agent00soul Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:39:09 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=2887#comment-820 We already know that the lens register is around 20 mm. So the question is how much thickness there is from the sensor surface to the back of the camera. There we have a part of the IS mechanism, probably a circuit board and then the LCD. What be could the combined thickness of these? I would guess around 10 mm. So a total thickness of around 30 mm seems very probable. We already know that the lens register is around 20 mm. So the question is how much thickness there is from the sensor surface to the back of the camera. There we have a part of the IS mechanism, probably a circuit board and then the LCD. What be could the combined thickness of these? I would guess around 10 mm. So a total thickness of around 30 mm seems very probable.

]]>