Comments on: (FT5) “PEN pro” camera in 2-3 years (via Megapixel)

By: Jono

Jono — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:58:30 +0000

I want a Pen Pro that is a digital OM4.

By: Eric

Eric — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:27:21 +0000

I just can’t wait to get rid of this x100. I would love to see a tiny camera with built in EVF and FAST AF.

By: yukonchris

yukonchris — Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:48:41 +0000

I hope Olympus reads this because in my opinion they need to get their act together. 4/3rds is essentially dead despite the E-5. and no matter how they spin it I am pretty sure that m4/3 will never be capable of offering the same dynamic range (just one important variable) as a larger sensor built on similar technology.

In the days of film, every good photographer knew that when all other variables were equal, larger film size meant better image quality. The same appears to be true of digital imagers. If 4/3rds is dead, then for goodness sake bring on smaller cameras with larger sensors as a second line. Every good make needs its formula one racer, if for no other reason than to prove that it can run in the same league as its competitors. Olympus needs something to complete with the likes of the D3s and 1ds of this world.

Looking at the latest offerings from Sony, a pro Pen two years down the line will be way too little and way too late. I’m a die-hard Olympus user, and even I am looking at the new NEX7 and thinking, Wow! Bigger sensor, smaller body, impressive build quality and finally some rational controls that offer direct access to shutter speed, and aperture. Frankly, if I don’t see something, at least, comparable from Olympus within 6 months, I’m very likely to switch systems. Patience is one thing, and blind hope is another.

By: Mindlessbuttonmasher

Mindlessbuttonmasher — Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:46:55 +0000

A pro camera need to be, obviously, built solidly with weather sealing, etc. Think Leica M Series or Nikon F Series. It need to perform under harsh circumstances flawlessly, think Nikon D3. No pop-up flashes or tilting LCDs, which are the first thing to break when dropped. Needs to have quick access to the obvious ISO, metering, etc. Needs to be part of a “system” where everything is interchangeable like rhe classic OM System. Will need more pro quality lenses such as the 12mm f/2.0. Such as a 35-40mm f/2.0 or faster (but small), 50mm f/1.4, etc. All with true manual focus override. No cheap plastic lenses that break the first time they are bumped. Also, the camera needs to be ALL black as do the lenses. Olympus needs to sell it BODY ONLY! it seems I’m the only one noticing that if you want a new Pen, you’re forces to buy the cheap lenses. Pros do NOT buy the kit lenses unless it’s paired with an L-Series like the Canon 5D MkIi was. But it was also sold separately.
Another feature is a pro camera should have is low ISOs. I’ll tale ISO 100 but would prefer ISO 50. As mentioned before a high quality, 100% view EVF. Finally, a quieter shutter. Thus is very important when shooting in delicate situations and, although listed last, for me one of the most important features. I almost sold my E-PL2 because if it loud shutter.
This us My opinion coming from 20 years experience as a newspaper photojournalist. I know how hard the job is on the equipment. Even the best, pro Nikons fail. I bought a Nikon D7000 to tide me over until Nikon announced their new pro cameras. Although the D700/D3 is still top notch, I couldn’t justify paying full price for three year old technology. I used the Nikon D7000 for two months, put 19,800 pics through it and it died. Nikon had it fir over a month, fixed it as new and I promptly sold it. Bottom line, it’s not pro grade and couldn’t handle the stress.

By: M

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:44:15 +0000

Except that I have the 12-60 and the 50-200. They ***SUCK*** on the PEN models.