Samsung NX-10 presentation at CES…NO COMMENT!
Sorry if I post a NX-10 related post again but I thought it may interest you to see how the guys from Samsung promote their NX-10.
Horrible!

Sorry if I post a NX-10 related post again but I thought it may interest you to see how the guys from Samsung promote their NX-10.
Horrible!
Anon
3 years ago |I lol’d.
Will
3 years ago |Poor guys. But bear in mind they’d given that talk a few dozen times already. They were probably more fresh earlier in the day!
reverse stream swimmer
3 years ago |I don’t find this presentation much different what to expect from the exhibition floor shows. These young salesmen have all attended the the same crash course in selling methodolgy.
However, I do find it a bit desperate of Samsung marketing to explicitly focus on their competition cons, since that usually backfires on themselves, and instead causing the potential buyer to become interested in the competing vendors.
Still I am looking forward to see how the NX10 (1.54x) with its two new zooms will fair against the APS-C competitiors, such as Sigma DP1/DP2 (1.74x), Leica X1 (1.53x), and Ricoh GXR.
fabio
3 years ago |they are mad! this is not a comparative adv, it’s a liar. And it is on your site too. Photographs know it isn’t true but I hope olympus and panasonic answer by legal
patrick
3 years ago |Being honorable and honest with potential customers is something that seems to be of no importance.
I wonder why they do not compare NX10 to Leica M8. Both use an APC-S format sensor and they could argue that NX10 is sooo much cheaper…
Jack
3 years ago |I’m very VERY happy of that! Is the time for The Price War btw Samsung and m4/3!
).
Samsung has NO ANY good lens…. “Plastic fantastic” of samsung lens cannot offer better quality than m4/3 even with bigger sensor.
)))
(…and I will buy oly for better price…I hope
Samsung has no chance
It could by worse if pentax’s pancakes could use AF on NX10, but thanks for God, Samsung is not so clever
Mark
3 years ago |Meanwhile at the Canon stand, “Look at that tiny little sensor, what is that, oh yeah the NX-10 mini sensor..”
At the same time in the Hasselblad stand, “Look at that tiny thing, what is that, oh yeah the Canon FF sensor..”
As Crocodile Dundee put it, “That’s not a knife, this is a knife.”
Sid
3 years ago |After seeing those obnoxious Kevin Spacey commercials, Samsung decided they needed to out-douche Olympus.
Radis.Rut
3 years ago |@Mark : That’s pretty funny
Well, those guy is doing what they were hired for, heh heh.
BB
3 years ago |Nice to hear from the NX10 guy that my 4/3 sensor “Doesn’t do anything” lol!
Seth
3 years ago |That’s comical in it’s sadness—I kept feeling awkward for the guy. It sounds like he just got off his shift at the magic bullet infomercial. At least “will it blend” does something destructive to entertain.
I especially love the screen shot of the blowups of sensor sizes with the Samsung surrounded by a much larger chassis than the 4/3rds sensor. Mind numbingly brilliant.
Cheers,
Seth
Will
3 years ago |Yeah, the larger chassis around the APSC is misleading, but fabio, they are not lying — the micro4/3rd sensor is smaller. End of story.
The micro4/3rds sensor will undoubtedly one day be standard in compact cameras. But the micro4/3rds sensor will never be more than that.
maxim
3 years ago |Nice body Samsung ! and now, show me your lens….
patrick
3 years ago |Will,
APS-C directly compares to (micro)4/3 in terms of resolution and noise. I doubt that there will be much difference when comparing a 14MP APS-C (pixelpitch ~5µm) to a 12MP FT (pixelpitch ~5µm).
My cameras with mFT-size sensor are both roughly compareable to 50D and D300 in size – far away from compact. mFT just defines another flange back and some further additions to FT.
joesiv
3 years ago |It really shows how Samsung feels intimidated by micro fourthirds.
Think about it this way, what’s the ratio of P&S users compared to micro fourthirds uses probably in that audience?
I would bet that most of them are point and shoot users, some probably haven’t even heard of mFT.
So why on earth would Samsung want to compare their APS-C sensor to fourthirds, when they could have just as easily compared it to the truely itty biddy sensor that most of those people in the audience actually have?
They’re threatened…
Eric
3 years ago |“It could by worse if pentax’s pancakes could use AF on NX10, but thanks for God, Samsung is not so clever”
I don’t understand your mentality. Why would you not want Pentax to make lenses for Samsung? Who cares who wins; I just want options. If Pentax makes glass for Samsung that could be a viable option for me. In-turn it would also force Olympus/Panasonic to keep on producing top notch gear.
joesiv
3 years ago |“It could by worse if pentax’s pancakes could use AF on NX10, but thanks for God, Samsung is not so clever”
not going to happen, All those nifty pancake pentax lens’ are auto focused using a screw drive that is found in the body. There’s no AF motor in the lens’, so I doubt you’re going to get AF with those lens’ on NX.
Oh, and the flange back distance would be need to be “made up” by use of a thick adapter, which would negate the benefits of being a pancake. (look at the GF1/E-P1 with the fouthirds adapter + fouthirds 25mm pancake, it’s nearly as big as the zoom kit lens)
Fuck. Off. Samsung. « b0rk b0rk b0rk
3 years ago |[...] way they are marketing their new NX-10 really sucks. If I were an engineer at Samsung who had worked on this project, I’d be heading down [...]