New Olympus XZ-1 and 75-300mm lens reviews.

Share

Photographyblog (Click here) tested the Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 Micro Four Thirds lens. After a five page long review the conclusion is: “Overall, we enjoyed shooting with the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 a lot and have been pleased with the results. Most of our photos came out sharp, with acceptable levels of distortion and almost no chromatic aberrations. However, a long telezoom like this will always be a speciality lens and with the M.Zuiko costing as much as it does, it seems one needs a very good reason to commit to a purchase.
Check the lens price and availability at Amazon, Olympus US store, Adorama, B&H, eBay

Pocket Lint (Click here) posted their Olympus XZ-1 review “Shoehorning in almost as many features as its E-PL2 bigger brother, if you don’t want to change the F/1.8, 28-112mm equivalent lens on the front, the XZ-1 is the easier to use, as well as transport. Sure, an asking price of £399 is not inconsiderable, but at least it’s comparable with its immediate rivals that are also priced at a premium. After practically holding a wake with the release of the E-5 DSLR, fortunately it’s now party hats and streamers time for Olympus in the case of the XZ-1.
Chek the camera price and availability at Amazon, Olympus US store, Adorama, B&H, eBay

Share
  • http://deleted printposter

    does anyone actually want to buy that olympus lens? f6.7 meh

    • Ganec

      I already own silver one…

      In reality it looks smaller than in this review.
      It is 116 mm long at wide, but on tele it is only 50 mm longer.

      • http://www.43rumors.com/members/lego/ lego

        so was it worth it? the quality you get for that price

        • George

          6.7 @ 300mm should priced at $300 max

        • Ganec

          I am quite surprised.
          Focusing is nearly silent and faster to the bundled lens with E-P1.
          (of course if it fits .. otherwise it hunts a little more)
          And re-focusing (if object is already nearly focused) is really short.

          BTW: manual focusing from hands (with zoom assist) on 600mm EQ is really imposible => if you think your hands are not shaking, maybe you will be surprised 😉

      • Guest

        wtf. shouldn’t it be 300 mm long at tele?

  • RT

    ha ha. A 300/6.7! Better off with a tamron 70-300 ld and manual focus by far.

    • Ganec

      Try it on a bird and you realize that even with this aperture the HO is very small and you have to increase it if you want whole bird to be sharp.

      It is different to ultrazoom, when HO is not so big problem.

      In a good light F6.7 is perfectly usable.
      (in bad light you don’t need to shoot with tele)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

What are Cookies?
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that is stored in a temporary location on your computer to allow our website to distinguish you from other users of the website. If you don't want to accept cookies, you'll still be able to browse the site and use it for research purposes. Most web browsers have cookies enabled, but at the bottom of this page you can see how to disable cookies. Please note that cookies can't harm your computer. We don't store personally identifiable information in the cookies, but we do use encrypted information gathered from them to help provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allow us to improve our site. You can watch a simple video from Google to find more information about cookies.

Cookies used by our Website
The 43rumors website, 43rumors.com, uses the following cookies for the collection of website usage statistics and to ensure that we can . These are anonymous and temporary. By using our website, you agree that we may place these types of cookies on your device.
Read how Google uses data when you use our partners' sites or apps: http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/partners/
Google Analytics Cookie Usage on Websites: https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/analyticsjs/cookie-usage?csw=1#cookiesSet Addthis cookies: http://www.addthis.com/privacy.
Disqus cookies: https://help.disqus.com/customer/portal/articles/466235-use-of-cookies.
Vimeo cookies: http://vimeo.com/privacy.
Youtube cookies: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/171780?hl=en-GB

Disabling/Enabling Cookies
You have the ability to accept or decline cookies by modifying the settings in your browser. Please note however that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our site. For information about how to disable cookies in your browser please visit the About Cookies website.

Close