Comments on: HOT!!! Also Carl Zeiss joins Micro Four Thirds!!!

By: Paulina

Paulina — Fri, 10 May 2013 07:37:47 +0000

You have to arm yourself with a variety of quotes to choose from.
The trial is not so high, it would be if he was not sure at all – but why
risk it. It’s as simple as that.

By: Program Pit 37

Program Pit 37 — Wed, 01 May 2013 02:16:11 +0000

Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I have really
enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

By: Kandace

Kandace — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:45:55 +0000

Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clearness to your submit is
simply excellent and that i could suppose you are a professional on this subject.

Well together with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed
to stay updated with impending post. Thank you a million and
please carry on the rewarding work.

By: kai

kai — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:22:46 +0000

you are missing something: not everyone uses their videocamera to shoot production movies. in fact, i’d wager most people dont.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:11:04 +0000

Even in ‘classic’ movie production – from Kubrick and his famous Zeiss Planar f0.7, to Terrence Malick to French nouvelle vague – many directors and DPs rely on nothing but natural light to light scenes.

A scene looks and feels different when the actors are under strong studio lights, this is why there are so many candle-lit (even a few match /cigarette-lit) scenes in films. Film makes have always been striving to push the boundaries of what is possible. Saying ‘you don’t need that in movie production’ simply doesn’t hold.