Honestly, I don´t understand what Olympus ( or some managers ) are doing or talking about. They started a survey years ago to find out which cameras people want or need. The results lead to the E-P1. Then they noticed: oh, there are other needs too, the “serious photographers with creative attitude” want some other cams. Oh my God…, I think everybody knows that without starting a survey.
From all I know until now, the OM-D is surely a cam I will buy for my m43-lenses, but why should a 43-user buy this cam for his 43-lenses??
The AF-speed still seems to lack…
And in nearly every interview they say: we will continue the development of the 43-system as well…. What does this mean?? New body? Perhaps, or not… New lenses? Perhaps, or not?
I had many 43-bodies and lenses in the past. E300, E1, E510, E620, E30, E3. Often I had problems with the AF-accuracy, especially with WA-lenses. The VF-size was acceptable only with E30 and E3.
What irritated me most, was the lack of a very well build portrait zoom in the 70-200 eqv. focal length. The 2,0/35-100 is far to heavy for this, why don´t they made this with same build quality but more compact with f2,8, 2,8-4 or even 4…? ( this would lead to a far lesser price btw.. )
There´s no such zoom, from no manufacturer….
All these very nice Oly lenses in the high class ( 2/35-100, 2/150,
2/14-35, 2,8/90-250, 2,8/300 ) need a equivalent with 1 or 2 stop smaller aperture, resulting in lower dimensions and lower price.
Even for the “serious photographers with creative attitude” the prices for the existing lenses are often too high….
only my thoughts….