Comments on: GH3 gets DxOmarked! Is on par with the E-M5.

By: JimD

JimD — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:23:53 +0000

The image takers yes.
Not the pathetic writings such as you have placed above.

The image is the true test.

What do you think cameras are for? Well what are they for?

By: JimD

JimD — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:18:12 +0000

That is not what he said, I don’t know if what he said is correct, nor am I interested. But what you say is not compatible with his comment. Try reading it again.

By: HHGD

HHGD — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:21:09 +0000

“So the image takers and not the measurers are the correct and appropriate test of a camera.”

The problem with that is that some buyers have such a wild need to justify their purchase that they claim that their camera can do miracles {IE:apparently the E-M5 is as good as the D800 with an awesome 6400ISO LOL]which,while amusing to the informed is not so much fun for anyone who naively believes them.For most people in most shooting situations a decent P&S is good enough you just need to look through any of the big photo hosting sites { Flickr etc}to see the truth of that.The further you deviate from typical [ decent lighting etc}shooting scenarios the more important image quality becomes. If you want the best C-AF, best DR, highest resolution best high ISO performance or any other unique feature the more it pays to look at what is available , and controlled RAW test shots will paint you a far clearer picture than the rantings of an over exuberant fanboy or the equally deluded rants of a troll.

By: HHGD

HHGD — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:08:39 +0000

Nikon said it is Nikon designed .Man,you guys here are bonkers lol So let me get this straight Sony were kind enough to help Toshiba fabricate a Nikon designed sensor with no financial gain coming to Sony, that kind of thinking could explain some of their huge losses ,

By: Duarte Bruno

Duarte Bruno — Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:28:06 +0000

LOL!
I was about to drop the same question.