<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT5) The Kit lens! M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 ED.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-kit-lens-mzuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-kit-lens-mzuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoodedOne</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-kit-lens-mzuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>HoodedOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3175#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>I know the image above is very small. But if the lens in the image is indeed the 14-42. I must say,  it looks remarkably like some voigtlander lenses.

Like this 35/1.2 Asph. Nokton (image from Camera Quest)
http://www.cameraquest.com/jpg6/VC%2035%201.2%20c.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the image above is very small. But if the lens in the image is indeed the 14-42. I must say,  it looks remarkably like some voigtlander lenses.</p>
<p>Like this 35/1.2 Asph. Nokton (image from Camera Quest)<br />
<a href="http://www.cameraquest.com/jpg6/VC%2035%201.2%20c.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.cameraquest.com/jpg6/VC%2035%201.2%20c.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent00soul</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-kit-lens-mzuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent00soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3175#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>Yes, as much as I want a faster zoom, I think it&#039;s a wise move to go for a maximally compact zoom first. I just hope a higher spec normal zoom will not be too far away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as much as I want a faster zoom, I think it&#8217;s a wise move to go for a maximally compact zoom first. I just hope a higher spec normal zoom will not be too far away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik from Sweden</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-the-kit-lens-mzuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik from Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3175#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>A faster zoom would obviously be longer and more expensive. The former is bad for the Micro format, the latter is bad for a kit lens.

I wish they put some effort in making faster primes in the 12-70 range, though, like the Lumix 20/1.7. And compact ultrawide primes (which may have to be slower).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A faster zoom would obviously be longer and more expensive. The former is bad for the Micro format, the latter is bad for a kit lens.</p>
<p>I wish they put some effort in making faster primes in the 12-70 range, though, like the Lumix 20/1.7. And compact ultrawide primes (which may have to be slower).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 430/439 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 04:37:15 -->
