(FT5) UPDATED-> White/beige E-P1 fullsize images!
Do you like it?
Source: http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=69151
Many Thanks to Kasey and O.N. who sent us the link simultaneously
UPDATE: The black E-P1 shown here (http://info.xitek.com/news/200906/15-20900.html) is clearly a fake!
.
UPDATE 2: Possible specs from http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=635107
Prices close to ¥ 90,000 ($917) Single lens plus two second half of the sale of 120,000 ($1,222) to ¥ 130,000 ($1,324)
17mm F2.8 sale ¥ 10,000 ($101) and 14-42mm F3.6-sell about ¥ 35,000 ($356)
SD 13M RAW JPEG RAW+JPEG
1280×720 7min 1280×720 7min video
640×480 14min 640×480 14min
Liveview with embedded electronic Liveview shake correction
3 LCD
11å€åŸŸAF 11 area AF
ISO 6400-200
Shutter speed 60-1/4000
.
P.S.: If you want to post the image on your blog/forum please use this link: http://i44.tinypic.com/2aaecd1.jpg
.
And support our website without paying a single penny:
- by simply choice to start your shopping by clicking one of our partnershops!
- by tolerating our google advertising (we get paid for every click). Thank you!
.
And feel free to join the 43rumors team writing an email at 43rumors@gmail.com



Mike
June 15, 2009 |Looks nice for a camera collectors, mostly white camera finish like “white Leica M8.2″ http://en.leica-camera.com/photography/special_editions/leica_M8_white/ so silver/black and beige/white options are coming and maybe fully black one I hope so. Price it like Panasonic LX-3 or less than Olympus E-620 street price at least (zoom or prime lens option with OVF included) and this mFT camera blows out serious compacts (image quality) and budget DSLRs (size). We will know more tomorow.
Mike
June 15, 2009 |Look at this: http://www.engadget.com/photos/olympus-e-p1-micro-four-thirds-leak-has-us-hot-bothered/2083313/ fully black. Is it fake or true?
Kelvin
June 15, 2009 |> Liveview with embedded electronic Liveview shake correction
Is this “shake correction” anything close to IS?
admin
June 15, 2009 |Yes! The E-P1 has BodyIS.
Bill
June 15, 2009 |Dylans: thanks. Still, kinda hard to imagine a new camera without sensor IS or OIS.
100 bucks for the pancake? sold.
henrik
June 15, 2009 |Lookswise, i don’t like it at all. And this camera could fast look dirty.
morgan
June 15, 2009 |The prices of the lenses don’t exactly make sense, unless $917 is for the kit with the pancake. Other wise you could have both for $1018, so I’m not sure where the higher prices are coming from.
I like the color scheme, but prefer silver or black.
While I like usually like the look of external VF’s, i think it takes away from the e-p1. I’m glad it has one, although I assume it’s optical and just for the 17mm.
Eric
June 15, 2009 |What’s up with the minimum ISO of 200? I really hope it has a 100 setting because 200 is a bit noisy on these sensors.
christian
June 15, 2009 |I guess the ISOs were just re-labelled. On the G1 the sensitivity is actually around 50% (reported by others) -100% (my observation) higher than for other cameras (at the same ISO setting). As almost no one measures the real sensitivity for noise testing, it makes sense to put higher ISO labels onto the camera and therefore get better reviews.
christian
June 15, 2009 |to clarify: I meant that previous ISO 100 is now called ISO 200 and so on. This also may explain that the highest setting is now 6400 (3200 on the G1). As the sensors are expected to be merely identical (to the G1 or the GH1), I guess there won’t be “real” changes in ISO
Jos
June 15, 2009 |The design is horrible, especially the upper part.
yoshitoshi
June 15, 2009 |Wow, $1k. I know this will have size advantage but hopefully for this price it at least challenges a low-end canon slr. Will wait for a silver or black one as well. This better be $1k worth of metal & quality and not junk feeling plastic like we are too used to.
unlikelymoose
June 15, 2009 |If Olympus is going to go retro with this camera, then they should have done it 100%.
The top white section tries to blend too many current design aesthetics with its beveled tier and sloping arc to the left of the Olympus logo.
The radius of all the corners are much too large. The corners should be much less round and much more angular.
The brown leather-like grip is an interesting venture. Yet it appears that this grip is simply a rounded rectangle on the front of the camera resulting in just a patch-like appearance. For stronger aesthetic appeal, the grip should wrap around the edge of the camera. The beveled frame around the grip is an awkward framing element which only emphasizes the look of it being a patch.
Essentially, the Olympus EP-1 should be more box-like in its overall appearance and within the details. Simplicity is king in retro design. Over-designed elements such as those featured in the white top diminish the retro look.
Backup for M8.2 - Sigma DP1 or DLux-4 - Leica User Forum
June 15, 2009 |[...] Backup for M8.2 – Sigma DP1 or DLux-4 What about the new Olympus EP-1 (4/3). http://43rumors.com/ft5-fullsize-of-…itebeige-e-p1/ And it will accept leica-M lenses. Angeh
Ben
June 15, 2009 |I’d love it if the 17mm lens was USD 100. I’d be absolutely amazed. Maybe only USD 100 more if you get it as a kit but standalone?
Also, USD 1,000 is the wrong price. No two ways about it. If it was pocketable with a 4/3 sensor, maybe. But it is to all intents and purposes the same size as the G1 with it’s excellent EVF (and similar price point).
Cassie
August 5, 2009 |The white and beige is absolutely gorgeous. Vintage. Elegant. Love it.