http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-first-picture-of-the-new-14-42mm-lens/ Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:31:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-first-picture-of-the-new-14-42mm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-9454 Gianni Galassi Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:03:14 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=11467#comment-9454 Nonsense, IMHO. They risk to confuse customers. I don't think 30 grams or a bunch of dollars less can really make the difference. M 4/3 is too young to afford such subtleties. And there are too many lenses missing in the system yet. Moreover, the plastic bayonet is cheap solution that I wouldn't see in a system that could reasonebly become, as I already stated in this pages, the Third Millennium Leica M. Nonsense, IMHO. They risk to confuse customers.
I don’t think 30 grams or a bunch of dollars less can really make the difference. M 4/3 is too young to afford such subtleties. And there are too many lenses missing in the system yet.
Moreover, the plastic bayonet is cheap solution that I wouldn’t see in a system that could reasonebly become, as I already stated in this pages, the Third Millennium Leica M.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-first-picture-of-the-new-14-42mm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-9392 Dunk Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:07:39 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=11467#comment-9392 I hope it is a kit lens option on other models, make the GF1 a bit cheaper. I'm sure most can do without the OIS switch. I hope it is a kit lens option on other models, make the GF1 a bit cheaper. I’m sure most can do without the OIS switch.

]]> http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-first-picture-of-the-new-14-42mm-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-9377 Mike Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:55:44 +0000 http://43rumors.com/?p=11467#comment-9377 So this means no in-body O.I.S. on the G2. Too bad, as I was hoping to combine O.I.S. on a G camera with the 20mm pancake. So this means no in-body O.I.S. on the G2. Too bad, as I was hoping to combine O.I.S. on a G camera with the 20mm pancake.

]]>