<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT4) CORRECTED-&gt; Olympus to go completely mirrorless!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-to-go-completely-mirrorless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-to-go-completely-mirrorless/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shenanval</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-to-go-completely-mirrorless/comment-page-1/#comment-8762</link>
		<dc:creator>Shenanval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11021#comment-8762</guid>
		<description>Actually, two years ago Olympus said that 12MPX was enough... and now they are saying apparently that 14MPX is more than enough. Not a contradiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, two years ago Olympus said that 12MPX was enough&#8230; and now they are saying apparently that 14MPX is more than enough. Not a contradiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napalm</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-to-go-completely-mirrorless/comment-page-1/#comment-8711</link>
		<dc:creator>napalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11021#comment-8711</guid>
		<description>hmm if I understand correctly, when they said the future of the E-system will be mirrorless... they&#039;re not talking about the same tech that the current mFT have. I expect newer technology than current mFT to be introduced in their cams like high-speed electronic shutters and hi-res EVF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm if I understand correctly, when they said the future of the E-system will be mirrorless&#8230; they&#8217;re not talking about the same tech that the current mFT have. I expect newer technology than current mFT to be introduced in their cams like high-speed electronic shutters and hi-res EVF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsed1</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-to-go-completely-mirrorless/comment-page-1/#comment-8710</link>
		<dc:creator>newsed1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11021#comment-8710</guid>
		<description>Actually, I have just read the AP article....

&#039;I would say that within 24 months the E system will not have a mirror box at all.&#039; Pelkowski said,

That means that it will take 24 months for all the current 4/3 cameras to be replaced with models using EVFs.

Does that mean that the E-5 will be first EVF 4/3s model? 

I think we can be certain that Nikon and Canon will go down this route by 2013 with their pro models, so why shouldn&#039;t Olympus get there first? 

Pelkowski also makes the point that current digital cameras are &#039;traditional film cameras&#039; with a digital sensor.

Perhaps the pitch for the E-5 (or whatever the first EVF model is) will be the first &#039;real&#039; digital camera, designed from the ground up to make the best of digital sensor technology?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I have just read the AP article&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8216;I would say that within 24 months the E system will not have a mirror box at all.&#8217; Pelkowski said,</p>
<p>That means that it will take 24 months for all the current 4/3 cameras to be replaced with models using EVFs.</p>
<p>Does that mean that the E-5 will be first EVF 4/3s model? </p>
<p>I think we can be certain that Nikon and Canon will go down this route by 2013 with their pro models, so why shouldn&#8217;t Olympus get there first? </p>
<p>Pelkowski also makes the point that current digital cameras are &#8216;traditional film cameras&#8217; with a digital sensor.</p>
<p>Perhaps the pitch for the E-5 (or whatever the first EVF model is) will be the first &#8216;real&#8217; digital camera, designed from the ground up to make the best of digital sensor technology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 489/501 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 03:10:04 -->
