<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT1) UPDATED: Only a typo error? New Olympus 12-16mm F2.8-4.0 SWD Lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-lens-12-16mm-f2-8-4-0-swd-lens-diameter72mm-was-listed-on-an-european-retailer-with-a-price-of-e-88900/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-lens-12-16mm-f2-8-4-0-swd-lens-diameter72mm-was-listed-on-an-european-retailer-with-a-price-of-e-88900/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Pitsch</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-lens-12-16mm-f2-8-4-0-swd-lens-diameter72mm-was-listed-on-an-european-retailer-with-a-price-of-e-88900/comment-page-1/#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Pitsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=6303#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>That is definitely a 12-60mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is definitely a 12-60mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pasha</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-lens-12-16mm-f2-8-4-0-swd-lens-diameter72mm-was-listed-on-an-european-retailer-with-a-price-of-e-88900/comment-page-1/#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator>pasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=6303#comment-4021</guid>
		<description>yeah it seems a bit useless lens, especially with that aperture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah it seems a bit useless lens, especially with that aperture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicci</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-olympus-lens-12-16mm-f2-8-4-0-swd-lens-diameter72mm-was-listed-on-an-european-retailer-with-a-price-of-e-88900/comment-page-1/#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>nicci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=6303#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>I think that it is a typo error between sixteen and sixty !
There&#039;s no new lens here, just the old very good 12-60 f2.8/4.

a 12-16 (equi. 24-32) at f2.8/4 will be a completely useless 0.5x zoom... so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is a typo error between sixteen and sixty !<br />
There&#8217;s no new lens here, just the old very good 12-60 f2.8/4.</p>
<p>a 12-16 (equi. 24-32) at f2.8/4 will be a completely useless 0.5x zoom&#8230; so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 493/503 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 10:42:14 -->
