<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT4) New Olympus E-3 and E-30 successor (one single camera?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-new-e-3-and-e-30-successor-one-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-new-e-3-and-e-30-successor-one-camera/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-new-e-3-and-e-30-successor-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11995</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9548#comment-11995</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still using an E-330 and getting very nice photos. I recently had an opportunity to use a Nikon D-90 for about a month and frankly, it wasn&#039;t that much better than my now outdated E-330. In some ways, especially interface, I preferred the Olympus. The proof is that long before I had to return the Nikon, I had already got into the habit of leaving it at home and taking out my old reliable Oly instead. My E-330 has a special character and robustness that I didn&#039;t see in the Nikon and frankly, I think this is one of Olympus&#039;s strengths.

With all of the above in mind, I hope Olympus don&#039;t rush out the next best thing but follow their tried and true method of building really dependable cameras with character. I too am in line for a new body, and I&#039;d like to upgrade to an E-3 successor. Here are some attributes I hope the new camera honours:

Excellent Dynamic Range - This is more important than high ISO performance for me;
Excellent colour fidelity - as usual;
Excellent optical viewfinder - This is the biggest problem with most 4/3s cameras, especially the E-330;
Reasonably compact dimensions - The E-330 is close to perfect in this respect, though it still seems bulky compared to OM series;
Reliable components - as usual with Olympus;
Rugged Construction - a la E-3 or Pentax K-7;
Market leading image quality at lower and moderate ISO settings;
Very good ISO performance up to 1600 - I personally don&#039;t care about extreme ISO performance;
Arrange buttons so that shooting specific controls are on right side and review or edit controls are on left;
Shooting mode and focus mode should be available as physical switches;
Excellent B&amp;W options available in-camera.
There are certainly more, but those are what come to mind.

It would also be nice to see Olympus release a fast prime lens in conjunction with the new camera. Something falling somewhere between 35 and 60 mm range (70 and 120mm equivalent range). A new high quality FourThirds lens will say as much or more about the Olympus commitment to FourThirds than a new body. Make it feel as solid as the old OM lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still using an E-330 and getting very nice photos. I recently had an opportunity to use a Nikon D-90 for about a month and frankly, it wasn&#8217;t that much better than my now outdated E-330. In some ways, especially interface, I preferred the Olympus. The proof is that long before I had to return the Nikon, I had already got into the habit of leaving it at home and taking out my old reliable Oly instead. My E-330 has a special character and robustness that I didn&#8217;t see in the Nikon and frankly, I think this is one of Olympus&#8217;s strengths.</p>
<p>With all of the above in mind, I hope Olympus don&#8217;t rush out the next best thing but follow their tried and true method of building really dependable cameras with character. I too am in line for a new body, and I&#8217;d like to upgrade to an E-3 successor. Here are some attributes I hope the new camera honours:</p>
<p>Excellent Dynamic Range &#8211; This is more important than high ISO performance for me;<br />
Excellent colour fidelity &#8211; as usual;<br />
Excellent optical viewfinder &#8211; This is the biggest problem with most 4/3s cameras, especially the E-330;<br />
Reasonably compact dimensions &#8211; The E-330 is close to perfect in this respect, though it still seems bulky compared to OM series;<br />
Reliable components &#8211; as usual with Olympus;<br />
Rugged Construction &#8211; a la E-3 or Pentax K-7;<br />
Market leading image quality at lower and moderate ISO settings;<br />
Very good ISO performance up to 1600 &#8211; I personally don&#8217;t care about extreme ISO performance;<br />
Arrange buttons so that shooting specific controls are on right side and review or edit controls are on left;<br />
Shooting mode and focus mode should be available as physical switches;<br />
Excellent B&amp;W options available in-camera.<br />
There are certainly more, but those are what come to mind.</p>
<p>It would also be nice to see Olympus release a fast prime lens in conjunction with the new camera. Something falling somewhere between 35 and 60 mm range (70 and 120mm equivalent range). A new high quality FourThirds lens will say as much or more about the Olympus commitment to FourThirds than a new body. Make it feel as solid as the old OM lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-new-e-3-and-e-30-successor-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11659</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 11:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9548#comment-11659</guid>
		<description>come onnnnnnnnnnnnn whre is the bludy E5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come onnnnnnnnnnnnn whre is the bludy E5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-new-e-3-and-e-30-successor-one-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-11636</link>
		<dc:creator>v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9548#comment-11636</guid>
		<description>well here it is may and there is no new four thirds camera. 

micro yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well here it is may and there is no new four thirds camera. </p>
<p>micro yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 489/501 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 03:38:03 -->
