<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT2) It is the Panasonic LX3 successor which you are going to see soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-it-is-the-panasonic-lx3-successor-you-are-going-to-see-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-it-is-the-panasonic-lx3-successor-you-are-going-to-see-soon/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:46:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLP</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-it-is-the-panasonic-lx3-successor-you-are-going-to-see-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-13766</link>
		<dc:creator>SLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 11:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4218#comment-13766</guid>
		<description>Well.....
It&#039;s a month from August 2010! One year later and still no LX4. Where are you getting your sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;..<br />
It&#8217;s a month from August 2010! One year later and still no LX4. Where are you getting your sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik from Sweden</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-it-is-the-panasonic-lx3-successor-you-are-going-to-see-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik from Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4218#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>People have WAY too much hope in back-side illumination, IMO. It&#039;s main promise is to restore the lost efficiency when pixels get even smaller than on the LX3, but the LX3 pixels are already very efficient so not much to hope for in that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have WAY too much hope in back-side illumination, IMO. It&#8217;s main promise is to restore the lost efficiency when pixels get even smaller than on the LX3, but the LX3 pixels are already very efficient so not much to hope for in that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-it-is-the-panasonic-lx3-successor-you-are-going-to-see-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4218#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>I already bought a LX3... yesterday.
This article is just.. just rumor!!! It&#039;s not true! It&#039;s imposible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already bought a LX3&#8230; yesterday.<br />
This article is just.. just rumor!!! It&#8217;s not true! It&#8217;s imposible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 488/516 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 09:48:56 -->
