<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (UPDATED: FT5) Busted? No 40-150mm f/2.8 coming&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptor-or-die</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-252470</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptor-or-die</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=35270#comment-252470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[never seen the appeal of zoomies .. not when you can use a good prime. My favourite Zuiko glass is the OM 135mm f/2.8 works a treat on OM, e-4:3 and mFT in the latter two it&#039;s 270mm focal equivilent is handy up close and off in the distance. It&#039;s not a big tele, but it&#039;s &quot;sweet spot useful&quot; Tons of Bokeh and DoF, and it&#039;s bright ... so if a ZD 135mm came out, that would be a lot more interesting [to me] than a zoomy dust pump! I look at the tiny mFT body with the Zuiko 135mm and compare that to a honking big Canon with one of those white monster primes on it ... freaking codpiece.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never seen the appeal of zoomies .. not when you can use a good prime. My favourite Zuiko glass is the OM 135mm f/2.8 works a treat on OM, e-4:3 and mFT in the latter two it&#8217;s 270mm focal equivilent is handy up close and off in the distance. It&#8217;s not a big tele, but it&#8217;s &#8220;sweet spot useful&#8221; Tons of Bokeh and DoF, and it&#8217;s bright &#8230; so if a ZD 135mm came out, that would be a lot more interesting [to me] than a zoomy dust pump! I look at the tiny mFT body with the Zuiko 135mm and compare that to a honking big Canon with one of those white monster primes on it &#8230; freaking codpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukthtasheeshabab Ibn Kuth</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-252358</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukthtasheeshabab Ibn Kuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=35270#comment-252358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am thinkink along those lines also. u43 does not have long fast lens and with Olympus not making such a lens, it will be a setback for some. Maybe setback for many.

Kockwell choose Nikon DX and Nikon 70-200VR is correct choice in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinkink along those lines also. u43 does not have long fast lens and with Olympus not making such a lens, it will be a setback for some. Maybe setback for many.</p>
<p>Kockwell choose Nikon DX and Nikon 70-200VR is correct choice in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-252311</link>
		<dc:creator>shanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=35270#comment-252311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@admin  any news on a E5 successor?about to dump my Oly for Pentax as pretty sure they never will come up with the goods for us 4/3 users...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@admin  any news on a E5 successor?about to dump my Oly for Pentax as pretty sure they never will come up with the goods for us 4/3 users&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avds</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-252301</link>
		<dc:creator>avds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=35270#comment-252301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My argument mostly distilled to the assumption that Panasonic bodies are more popular than those from Olympus, so there must be a pretty narrow target market for non-stabilized Olympus teles. However after I looked up sales rankings I think that assumption might be wrong. Still, I don&#039;t think that the bias in the number of reviews towards Panasonic teles (the 45-200 in particular) can be explained by kit sales because Olympus kits with tele lenses don&#039;t look to be hugely popular either (again, judging by relative number of reviews), so I guess there must be another explanation and one that would account for the high similarity of the 45-200 and Olympus 40-150 in terms of features (except OIS) and price...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My argument mostly distilled to the assumption that Panasonic bodies are more popular than those from Olympus, so there must be a pretty narrow target market for non-stabilized Olympus teles. However after I looked up sales rankings I think that assumption might be wrong. Still, I don&#8217;t think that the bias in the number of reviews towards Panasonic teles (the 45-200 in particular) can be explained by kit sales because Olympus kits with tele lenses don&#8217;t look to be hugely popular either (again, judging by relative number of reviews), so I guess there must be another explanation and one that would account for the high similarity of the 45-200 and Olympus 40-150 in terms of features (except OIS) and price&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft4-busted-no-40-150mm-f2-8-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-252294</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=35270#comment-252294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Why do we need a sucessor of the EM-5 and why do we need a new Sensor? The OM-D can go the next two years, we need lenses...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Why do we need a sucessor of the EM-5 and why do we need a new Sensor? The OM-D can go the next two years, we need lenses&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 21/37 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc
Object Caching 314/324 objects using apc

 Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2013-05-19 11:08:35 by W3 Total Cache -->