<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT3) Updated2-&gt;The next three Panasonic MicroFourThirds lenses.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smit</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still hoping for a 25mm prime as well, either from Pany or Oly, or perhaps even Leica. Hopefully a fast one at that!
Lets hope the manufacturers do listen to the polls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still hoping for a 25mm prime as well, either from Pany or Oly, or perhaps even Leica. Hopefully a fast one at that!<br />
Lets hope the manufacturers do listen to the polls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>Would somebody please explain why the new pancake lens will be 20mm instead of 25mm?

A 25mm lens would be a 50mm equivalent, which is considered a &quot;normal&quot; prime lens. Why would Panasonic make a lens that is not considered standard in photography?


Luis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would somebody please explain why the new pancake lens will be 20mm instead of 25mm?</p>
<p>A 25mm lens would be a 50mm equivalent, which is considered a &#8220;normal&#8221; prime lens. Why would Panasonic make a lens that is not considered standard in photography?</p>
<p>Luis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joenel Umal</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Joenel Umal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>Wow.. the coming of these new lenses will definitely make me purchase a micro 4/3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.. the coming of these new lenses will definitely make me purchase a micro 4/3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maas</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2385</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2385</guid>
		<description>Argh, that should have read &#039;faster than f1.4&#039; not f1.5.

There have been f1.2, f1 and f0.95 Noctiluxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh, that should have read &#8216;faster than f1.4&#8242; not f1.5.</p>
<p>There have been f1.2, f1 and f0.95 Noctiluxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maas</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>Note Noctilux just means faster than f1.5


And a 30/1.4 would be very nice, it&#039;s close to the 58mm length I favour as a wider portrait lens on 35mm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note Noctilux just means faster than f1.5</p>
<p>And a 30/1.4 would be very nice, it&#8217;s close to the 58mm length I favour as a wider portrait lens on 35mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francesco</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>Sorry not any zoom, but a zoom with a variable maximum aperture lens will be a vario, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry not any zoom, but a zoom with a variable maximum aperture lens will be a vario, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Gianni</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify Leica names:

f1 = Noctilux
f1.4 = Summilux
f2.0 = Summicron
f2.4-2.5 = Summarit
f2.8 = Elmarit
f4.0 = Elmar

A Zoom is a vario, so the  16-50mm f/2.5-4.8, if it happens, will be a vario summarit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify Leica names:</p>
<p>f1 = Noctilux<br />
f1.4 = Summilux<br />
f2.0 = Summicron<br />
f2.4-2.5 = Summarit<br />
f2.8 = Elmarit<br />
f4.0 = Elmar</p>
<p>A Zoom is a vario, so the  16-50mm f/2.5-4.8, if it happens, will be a vario summarit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>I am continuely in touch with him and he seems to be serious. But only time can proof it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am continuely in touch with him and he seems to be serious. But only time can proof it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Got no info about the lens :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got no info about the lens <img src='http://43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Emele</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Emele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>Panasonic G 45 mm F2,8 OIS Macro???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panasonic G 45 mm F2,8 OIS Macro???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joesiv</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-next-three-panasonic-microfourthirds-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>joesiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4038#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having my doubts on this source...

wouldn&#039;t the zoom be a vario, since the aperture isn&#039;t fixed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having my doubts on this source&#8230;</p>
<p>wouldn&#8217;t the zoom be a vario, since the aperture isn&#8217;t fixed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
