<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT3) The Leica MicroFourThirds 30mm f1.4 lens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-leica-microfourthirds-30mm-f1-4-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-leica-microfourthirds-30mm-f1-4-lens/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:55:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent00soul</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-leica-microfourthirds-30mm-f1-4-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent00soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3714#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>Why 30 mm? Personally, I think it&#039;s the least desired focal length of all. It&#039;s too long to be a &quot;normal&quot; but too short to be a portrait tele. Personally, I would not buy a prime between 20 and 40 mm. Why can&#039;t they do a 40/1.4 (or 42 or 45)  instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why 30 mm? Personally, I think it&#8217;s the least desired focal length of all. It&#8217;s too long to be a &#8220;normal&#8221; but too short to be a portrait tele. Personally, I would not buy a prime between 20 and 40 mm. Why can&#8217;t they do a 40/1.4 (or 42 or 45)  instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imeline</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-leica-microfourthirds-30mm-f1-4-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Imeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3714#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>60mm equivalent?
not interested either.

Not interested in any primes in the 26-44mm (52-88 eq.) range. I&#039;d prefer something more like this:
50mm -&gt; Nice for Portraits (1.8 at least). (Or a macro version would be nice)
20mm-&gt; Perfect Normal lens (I&#039;m putting off my EP-1 decision until I see Panasonic&#039;s 20 1.7). I certainly prefer 40 eq to 50eq as normal lens. Of course 1.4 (or more) would be sweet :)
Prime in the 7-10 range (2.8 at least).

What do you think? What lenses would you want? (Let&#039;s help Olympus with their roadmap! ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>60mm equivalent?<br />
not interested either.</p>
<p>Not interested in any primes in the 26-44mm (52-88 eq.) range. I&#8217;d prefer something more like this:<br />
50mm -&gt; Nice for Portraits (1.8 at least). (Or a macro version would be nice)<br />
20mm-&gt; Perfect Normal lens (I&#8217;m putting off my EP-1 decision until I see Panasonic&#8217;s 20 1.7). I certainly prefer 40 eq to 50eq as normal lens. Of course 1.4 (or more) would be sweet <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Prime in the 7-10 range (2.8 at least).</p>
<p>What do you think? What lenses would you want? (Let&#8217;s help Olympus with their roadmap! <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinespree</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-the-leica-microfourthirds-30mm-f1-4-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>pinespree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3714#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d pay $1000-$1500 for anything approximately 17-26mm f/2. I wouldn&#039;t buy a 30mm at all - just don&#039;t have any interest in that focal length. I&#039;d rather have an f/2 than a 1.4 as well, to keep it small and light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d pay $1000-$1500 for anything approximately 17-26mm f/2. I wouldn&#8217;t buy a 30mm at all &#8211; just don&#8217;t have any interest in that focal length. I&#8217;d rather have an f/2 than a 1.4 as well, to keep it small and light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 497/509 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 03:57:00 -->
