<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT3) Panasonic 7-28mm wide angle lens coming???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Coco</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-194596</link>
		<dc:creator>Coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=32554#comment-194596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, Panasonic are not world leaders in optical design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Panasonic are not world leaders in optical design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esa Tuunanen</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-194588</link>
		<dc:creator>Esa Tuunanen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=32554#comment-194588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These guys without grasp from reality would clearly demand filter thread also in this:
http://www.petapixel.com/2012/05/08/160000-nikkor-6mm-fisheye-in-action-on-a-nikon-d800/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys without grasp from reality would clearly demand filter thread also in this:<br />
<a href="http://www.petapixel.com/2012/05/08/160000-nikkor-6mm-fisheye-in-action-on-a-nikon-d800/" rel="nofollow">http://www.petapixel.com/2012/05/08/160000-nikkor-6mm-fisheye-in-action-on-a-nikon-d800/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulli</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-194580</link>
		<dc:creator>ulli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=32554#comment-194580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not a joke,i was just commenting on the expected big size,ceramic lenses,becasue of higher refractive index, could decrease size around 20 %]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a joke,i was just commenting on the expected big size,ceramic lenses,becasue of higher refractive index, could decrease size around 20 %</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mungo</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-194554</link>
		<dc:creator>Mungo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=32554#comment-194554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would totally get that if f-stop was ok, that means at least f/4 for the whole range. But it is not going to happen. I agree with others that there might be a typo, 7-18 seems much more plausible. Even that sounds almost too good...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would totally get that if f-stop was ok, that means at least f/4 for the whole range. But it is not going to happen. I agree with others that there might be a typo, 7-18 seems much more plausible. Even that sounds almost too good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sqweezy</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-7-28mm-wide-angle-lens-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-194406</link>
		<dc:creator>Sqweezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=32554#comment-194406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what the next version could be:
7-14mm range (or perhaps 6-12mm), with constant f/2.8, power O.I.S, and weather sealed! It would be the next iteration of the X line and complement the 12-35mm and 35-100mm perfectly! 
From there, all that&#039;s missing is the next version of 100-300mm with f/2.8!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what the next version could be:<br />
7-14mm range (or perhaps 6-12mm), with constant f/2.8, power O.I.S, and weather sealed! It would be the next iteration of the X line and complement the 12-35mm and 35-100mm perfectly!<br />
From there, all that&#8217;s missing is the next version of 100-300mm with f/2.8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/49 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 326/365 objects using apc

 Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2013-06-20 09:36:56 by W3 Total Cache -->