<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT3) First rumors about the new Panasonic sensor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-first-rumors-about-the-new-panasonic-sensor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-first-rumors-about-the-new-panasonic-sensor/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-first-rumors-about-the-new-panasonic-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5808</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=8544#comment-5808</guid>
		<description>Archer is right.  In a normal sensor a lot of the circuits actually lie above the photosites.  This blocks some of the light coming in.  Putting those on top would allow the sensor to collect more light.  The smaller size of 4/3s sensors should make it easier for Pana/Oly to implement first, although it will come to all the sensors eventually.  Because the photosites will be less deep Oly&#039;s telecentric design will probably be a little less important.  You might see a lot more improvement using older lenses with sensors of this design.  It might be one reason the telecentric requirements were relaxed for m4/3s and/or we might see lenses faster then f2 to go alone with a backlit sensor.  These are all wild guesses though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archer is right.  In a normal sensor a lot of the circuits actually lie above the photosites.  This blocks some of the light coming in.  Putting those on top would allow the sensor to collect more light.  The smaller size of 4/3s sensors should make it easier for Pana/Oly to implement first, although it will come to all the sensors eventually.  Because the photosites will be less deep Oly&#8217;s telecentric design will probably be a little less important.  You might see a lot more improvement using older lenses with sensors of this design.  It might be one reason the telecentric requirements were relaxed for m4/3s and/or we might see lenses faster then f2 to go alone with a backlit sensor.  These are all wild guesses though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archer</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-first-rumors-about-the-new-panasonic-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Archer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=8544#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>Back illumination is good for all sizes of chips.  It was developed by astronomers using REALLY BIG sensors to improve QE.  It also takes care of the angle of incidence problems on larger sensors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back illumination is good for all sizes of chips.  It was developed by astronomers using REALLY BIG sensors to improve QE.  It also takes care of the angle of incidence problems on larger sensors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drj</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft3-first-rumors-about-the-new-panasonic-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5775</link>
		<dc:creator>drj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=8544#comment-5775</guid>
		<description>Entirely agree with Agent00soul, but this also suggests that the earlier rumors about Olympus 4/3 cameras with Fuji sensors won&#039;t come to reality.  Be that as it may, a  Fuji m4/3 camera - I have never used a camera with their EXR approach  but the DR of their earlier Super CCD technology was just fantastic - would be a nice compensation  though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entirely agree with Agent00soul, but this also suggests that the earlier rumors about Olympus 4/3 cameras with Fuji sensors won&#8217;t come to reality.  Be that as it may, a  Fuji m4/3 camera &#8211; I have never used a camera with their EXR approach  but the DR of their earlier Super CCD technology was just fantastic &#8211; would be a nice compensation  though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 489/499 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 04:25:53 -->
