<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT2)Two new Panasonic MFT cameras to come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft2two-new-panasonic-mft-cameras-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft2two-new-panasonic-mft-cameras-to-come/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:10:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave-in-Mi</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft2two-new-panasonic-mft-cameras-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave-in-Mi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=10439#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>The GH2 has to keep the DSLR-like body. I don&#039;t want one of those little &quot;cigarette pack&quot; cameras (GF1, L1, Rangefinder). Sorry, I know it&#039;s a classic shape, but not for me. They need to bring up the blue body option from the G1, so I can get a matching ZS7 for snapshots and GH2 for serious shooting. :-) If they can weather-proof the body like the $1500 cameras from Canon &amp; Nikon, that&#039;d be nice. Would they announce the GH2 &amp; GF2, even if they&#039;re not going to be available until Summer? If not, I suspect one of the new cameras will be an entry level product like the E-PL1 that will take the place of the LX3, leaving Panasonic with only 2 sensors to worry about (1/2.33 &amp; 4/3).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GH2 has to keep the DSLR-like body. I don&#8217;t want one of those little &#8220;cigarette pack&#8221; cameras (GF1, L1, Rangefinder). Sorry, I know it&#8217;s a classic shape, but not for me. They need to bring up the blue body option from the G1, so I can get a matching ZS7 for snapshots and GH2 for serious shooting. <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  If they can weather-proof the body like the $1500 cameras from Canon &amp; Nikon, that&#8217;d be nice. Would they announce the GH2 &amp; GF2, even if they&#8217;re not going to be available until Summer? If not, I suspect one of the new cameras will be an entry level product like the E-PL1 that will take the place of the LX3, leaving Panasonic with only 2 sensors to worry about (1/2.33 &amp; 4/3).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWE_Output</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft2two-new-panasonic-mft-cameras-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>SWE_Output</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=10439#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to see that a model wich is both as compact and also superior to the GF1 would be set for release anytime soon. It would be easy to suggest that the video-recording could be improved (stereo instead of mono, more FPS etc), and also that the LCD-display could be 920,000 dots  instead of 460,00 (like many Nikon and Sony cameras in the same pricegroup, but then again the main rival ep-2 has 230,00 ...) But the GF1 marely has 5 month on the market, at least here in northen Europe, and it&#039;s most critical con so far has been it&#039;s pricetag. People in general are pleased with what the GF1 offers in terms of functions and settings: the camera is not aiming for pros. And at the moment I don&#039;t think the IQ could be much improved in a compact shell like the GF1, so I don&#039;t think the hardcore enthusiasts will take a peek at Panny just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to see that a model wich is both as compact and also superior to the GF1 would be set for release anytime soon. It would be easy to suggest that the video-recording could be improved (stereo instead of mono, more FPS etc), and also that the LCD-display could be 920,000 dots  instead of 460,00 (like many Nikon and Sony cameras in the same pricegroup, but then again the main rival ep-2 has 230,00 &#8230;) But the GF1 marely has 5 month on the market, at least here in northen Europe, and it&#8217;s most critical con so far has been it&#8217;s pricetag. People in general are pleased with what the GF1 offers in terms of functions and settings: the camera is not aiming for pros. And at the moment I don&#8217;t think the IQ could be much improved in a compact shell like the GF1, so I don&#8217;t think the hardcore enthusiasts will take a peek at Panny just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mart</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft2two-new-panasonic-mft-cameras-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-7936</link>
		<dc:creator>Mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=10439#comment-7936</guid>
		<description>Even a small update to the GH1 would be nice.. change the small dial to ISO and move single/continuous/manual focus to a three way switch. Change the film and quick menu buttons to &#039;A&#039; and &#039;B&#039; and just make them configurable (or replace with said three way switch). Either make the quick menu actually quick or get rid of it. Add a higher quality encoding option and let me choose between 50p/60p.

Never going to happen but I&#039;d also happily see all the scene modes deleted and the PASM dial changed to shutter speed plus A mode... or just simplify it like the GF1 dial... or make it two-tier like the G11 and put exposure compensation on the small dial.

Or better yet add a proper exposure mode that simply exposes &quot;to the right&quot;. Then I wouldn&#039;t even need exposure compensation.
http://luminous-landscape.com/essays/leica-open-letter.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a small update to the GH1 would be nice.. change the small dial to ISO and move single/continuous/manual focus to a three way switch. Change the film and quick menu buttons to &#8216;A&#8217; and &#8216;B&#8217; and just make them configurable (or replace with said three way switch). Either make the quick menu actually quick or get rid of it. Add a higher quality encoding option and let me choose between 50p/60p.</p>
<p>Never going to happen but I&#8217;d also happily see all the scene modes deleted and the PASM dial changed to shutter speed plus A mode&#8230; or just simplify it like the GF1 dial&#8230; or make it two-tier like the G11 and put exposure compensation on the small dial.</p>
<p>Or better yet add a proper exposure mode that simply exposes &#8220;to the right&#8221;. Then I wouldn&#8217;t even need exposure compensation.<br />
<a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/essays/leica-open-letter.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/essays/leica-open-letter.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 442/467 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 03:20:35 -->
