<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT1) UPDATED -&gt; Crazy rumor: E-5 with new mount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft1-crazy-rumor-e-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft1-crazy-rumor-e-5/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft1-crazy-rumor-e-5/comment-page-1/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9645#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>Marky (first post) clearly doesn&#039;t understand anything about lens mounts.  It&#039;s not possible to use a m4/3s mount in a SLR because of the mirror.  Not enough space.  Using the 4/3s mount in a m4/3s camera negates all the benefits that m4/3s is supposed to bring.  (size/weight)  Any other brand that comes out with a mirrorless camera will have a new mount.  Carrying over their DSLR mount would be crazy.

@Edgaras  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s possible to put a m4/3s lens on a 4/3s camera and get it to focus.  The focus distance is set to about 2cm, vs about 4cm in 4/3s.  Lens adapters can only mount lenses from a system with a longer flange distance than the system you are adapting to.  This is why you haven&#039;t been able to use M-mount lenses on another system until now.  Something might be possible, but the fact it hasn&#039;t been done yet means it&#039;s too expensive/unacceptable quality or just not possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marky (first post) clearly doesn&#8217;t understand anything about lens mounts.  It&#8217;s not possible to use a m4/3s mount in a SLR because of the mirror.  Not enough space.  Using the 4/3s mount in a m4/3s camera negates all the benefits that m4/3s is supposed to bring.  (size/weight)  Any other brand that comes out with a mirrorless camera will have a new mount.  Carrying over their DSLR mount would be crazy.</p>
<p>@Edgaras  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible to put a m4/3s lens on a 4/3s camera and get it to focus.  The focus distance is set to about 2cm, vs about 4cm in 4/3s.  Lens adapters can only mount lenses from a system with a longer flange distance than the system you are adapting to.  This is why you haven&#8217;t been able to use M-mount lenses on another system until now.  Something might be possible, but the fact it hasn&#8217;t been done yet means it&#8217;s too expensive/unacceptable quality or just not possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (FT4) The E-3 successor definitely has a FourThirds mount! And new FourThirds lenses are coming?</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft1-crazy-rumor-e-5/comment-page-1/#comment-7086</link>
		<dc:creator>(FT4) The E-3 successor definitely has a FourThirds mount! And new FourThirds lenses are coming?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9645#comment-7086</guid>
		<description>[...] of my best sources told me the E-3 successor will have the normal FourThirds mount. The crazy rumor we posted yesterday is really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my best sources told me the E-3 successor will have the normal FourThirds mount. The crazy rumor we posted yesterday is really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft1-crazy-rumor-e-5/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=9645#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>What about new mount by adding some new contact points for future new functions in lenses - it would count as new mount and would be compatible with all (old) 4/3 lenses - I&#039;m sure there is a way to do it.

Then new &quot;full&quot; 4/3 lenses would be usable with all functions on m4/3 (which has more contacts via new adapter)  

meaning - video functions in 4/3 dslr or maybe new IS functions (with motion sensors in lenses – i should patent it  .
I would be followed by new updated lenses (SHG first)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about new mount by adding some new contact points for future new functions in lenses &#8211; it would count as new mount and would be compatible with all (old) 4/3 lenses &#8211; I&#8217;m sure there is a way to do it.</p>
<p>Then new &#8220;full&#8221; 4/3 lenses would be usable with all functions on m4/3 (which has more contacts via new adapter)  </p>
<p>meaning &#8211; video functions in 4/3 dslr or maybe new IS functions (with motion sensors in lenses – i should patent it  .<br />
I would be followed by new updated lenses (SHG first)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 492/506 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-10 20:08:49 -->
