<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (a long term rumor) Olympus is working on a completely new simultaneus HDR System.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft-olympus-invents-completely-new-hdr-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-olympus-invents-completely-new-hdr-system/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Polis</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-olympus-invents-completely-new-hdr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Polis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=5710#comment-3549</guid>
		<description>The reason their is a light increase is that the dichroic filters split the light into red, green and blue portions, rather than the bayer filter which absorbs the unwanted colours.  So instead of 2/3rds of the light being absorbed, it is all directed to the appropriate sensor.

And again, this is not for µ4/3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason their is a light increase is that the dichroic filters split the light into red, green and blue portions, rather than the bayer filter which absorbs the unwanted colours.  So instead of 2/3rds of the light being absorbed, it is all directed to the appropriate sensor.</p>
<p>And again, this is not for µ4/3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snk</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-olympus-invents-completely-new-hdr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>snk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=5710#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>This is possible onli for m4/3?, not for 4/3 ... And then camera will be huge ]:-&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is possible onli for m4/3?, not for 4/3 &#8230; And then camera will be huge ]:-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zigi_S</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-olympus-invents-completely-new-hdr-system/comment-page-1/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>zigi_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=5710#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>&quot;3. The effect of doing this is the equivalent of increasing the sensor size approximately threefold. So about the same area as APS-H. It puts the output a solid step above APS-C, but not quite to the level of full frame cameras. Still, the lenses would still work exactly the same as they do now.&quot;

What about the light gathered by the lens. IT would still be the same. I don&#039;t see any noise advantage with this setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;3. The effect of doing this is the equivalent of increasing the sensor size approximately threefold. So about the same area as APS-H. It puts the output a solid step above APS-C, but not quite to the level of full frame cameras. Still, the lenses would still work exactly the same as they do now.&#8221;</p>
<p>What about the light gathered by the lens. IT would still be the same. I don&#8217;t see any noise advantage with this setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 489/501 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 04:04:02 -->
