<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (FT 4) All four Olympus prime lenses!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/ft-4-two-other-olympus-prime-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-4-two-other-olympus-prime-lenses/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OM-PRO</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-4-two-other-olympus-prime-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-109756</link>
		<dc:creator>OM-PRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=1952#comment-109756</guid>
		<description>+++1

1) Zooms at F2.0 (12-35 mm, 35-100 mm wanted)

2) Primes at least at F2.0 (10 mm wanted)

3) Primes with a focal length in the range of 14 mm to 45 mm at least at 1.4 

4) Primes at F1.0 
Voigtlaender is able to build some with MF. So, why not Olympus with fast and accurate AF?

rufus44:
&quot;... they need it to get a comparable out-of-focus look ... that means oly’s should be at f1.0&quot;

Two thumbs up!

And please, matt-black version first. Silver version second.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+++1</p>
<p>1) Zooms at F2.0 (12-35 mm, 35-100 mm wanted)</p>
<p>2) Primes at least at F2.0 (10 mm wanted)</p>
<p>3) Primes with a focal length in the range of 14 mm to 45 mm at least at 1.4 </p>
<p>4) Primes at F1.0<br />
Voigtlaender is able to build some with MF. So, why not Olympus with fast and accurate AF?</p>
<p>rufus44:<br />
&#8220;&#8230; they need it to get a comparable out-of-focus look &#8230; that means oly’s should be at f1.0&#8243;</p>
<p>Two thumbs up!</p>
<p>And please, matt-black version first. Silver version second.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OM-PRO</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-4-two-other-olympus-prime-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-109723</link>
		<dc:creator>OM-PRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=1952#comment-109723</guid>
		<description>+++1

F2.0 100 mm Macro 1:1 black metalfinish

+++1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+++1</p>
<p>F2.0 100 mm Macro 1:1 black metalfinish</p>
<p>+++1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/ft-4-two-other-olympus-prime-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-25494</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=1952#comment-25494</guid>
		<description>How about some tele primes?

150 f/2
200 f/2.8
300 f/4

And, on the other end:

12 f/2.8

Finally, a super bright:

25 f/1.0 (with autofocus)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about some tele primes?</p>
<p>150 f/2<br />
200 f/2.8<br />
300 f/4</p>
<p>And, on the other end:</p>
<p>12 f/2.8</p>
<p>Finally, a super bright:</p>
<p>25 f/1.0 (with autofocus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 498/510 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-11 21:59:42 -->
