<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focus speed test comparison between the E-P1 and GH1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/focus-speed-test-comparison-between-the-e-p1-and-gh1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/focus-speed-test-comparison-between-the-e-p1-and-gh1/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaunmotion</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/focus-speed-test-comparison-between-the-e-p1-and-gh1/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaunmotion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3860#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>I totally agree - AF tests are tricky to do. My quick comparison wasn&#039;t meant to be a professional review but to show what I generally experienced with the two cameras. Shooting different subjects like landscapes or close-ups didn&#039;t change much in AF speed, and while shooting in low light the Panasonic lens/camera slowed down less than the E-P1. However, both cameras/lenses are very capable and never prevented me from taking the shots I wanted. There are lots of other important facts, as well, like AF precision and great JPEG engine of the E-P1 that made me keep the E-P1 for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree &#8211; AF tests are tricky to do. My quick comparison wasn&#8217;t meant to be a professional review but to show what I generally experienced with the two cameras. Shooting different subjects like landscapes or close-ups didn&#8217;t change much in AF speed, and while shooting in low light the Panasonic lens/camera slowed down less than the E-P1. However, both cameras/lenses are very capable and never prevented me from taking the shots I wanted. There are lots of other important facts, as well, like AF precision and great JPEG engine of the E-P1 that made me keep the E-P1 for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-P1ã¨GHã®AFé€Ÿåº¦æ¯”è¼ƒ at iPhone, Mac, E-420 ã®ãƒ–ãƒ­ã‚°</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/focus-speed-test-comparison-between-the-e-p1-and-gh1/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>E-P1ã¨GHã®AFé€Ÿåº¦æ¯”è¼ƒ at iPhone, Mac, E-420 ã®ãƒ–ãƒ­ã‚°</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3860#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>[...] OLYMPUS PEN E-P1ã¨LUMIX DMC-GH1ã®ã‚ªãƒ¼ãƒˆãƒ•ã‚©ãƒ¼ã‚«ã‚¹é€Ÿåº¦ã®æ¯”è¼ƒ(å‹•ç”»)ã‚’ã€4/3 rumorsãŒæŽ²è¼‰ã—ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OLYMPUS PEN E-P1ã¨LUMIX DMC-GH1ã®ã‚ªãƒ¼ãƒˆãƒ•ã‚©ãƒ¼ã‚«ã‚¹é€Ÿåº¦ã®æ¯”è¼ƒ(å‹•ç”»)ã‚’ã€4/3 rumorsãŒæŽ²è¼‰ã—ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger 9</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/focus-speed-test-comparison-between-the-e-p1-and-gh1/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=3860#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>AF tests are tricky because one camera might perform better with one type of subject, under one kind of lighting, etc., and another camera might perform better in another.

Still, it&#039;s pretty obvious that Pana put more work into AF performance and that it pays off. With its EVF and better AF speed, it&#039;s clear that the Pana is the better choice of the two for action shooting.

On the other hand, I&#039;d have to say I was surprised to see that the Eepy One&#039;s AF performance doesn&#039;t bite as much as I thought it would. I&#039;m sure that for a lot of people who shoot primarily static subjects, it&#039;ll be completely acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AF tests are tricky because one camera might perform better with one type of subject, under one kind of lighting, etc., and another camera might perform better in another.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s pretty obvious that Pana put more work into AF performance and that it pays off. With its EVF and better AF speed, it&#8217;s clear that the Pana is the better choice of the two for action shooting.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;d have to say I was surprised to see that the Eepy One&#8217;s AF performance doesn&#8217;t bite as much as I thought it would. I&#8217;m sure that for a lot of people who shoot primarily static subjects, it&#8217;ll be completely acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 489/499 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 05:00:59 -->
