First Panasonic GH2 hands-on preview at Systemkameraforum.de (all good news!)
SystemKameraForum is the first website to post a Panasonic GH2 camera review. The test is available as PDF only and you need a forum registration to download it. Oh, and it’s in german only!
We can give you a translation of the review high-lights:
- The autofocus is very fast (and faster than on the Panasonic GH1). Even in extreme bright or dark situations! The say this camera allows a “new dimention of autofus speed, not comparable with the other Panasonic models!”
- They tested the AF-speed with many Panasonic lenses and the AF speed improves on all lenses!
- The AF is faster than the Canon EOS 5D Mark II
- They like the Multi-aspect Bracketing. The GH2 can take 4 continous shots in 16:9 3:2 4:3 1:1!
- Even if the firmware was not in final stage the GH2 has better sharpness, dynamic range and HIGH-ISO than the GH1. They see an 1 stop improvement compared to the GH1.
They say the GH2 is not a revolution but a very concrete evolution of the GH1.
clark
3 years ago |I wonder what they say specifically regarding high ISO noise performance. Any banding?
sahara_knight
3 years ago |i guess this quote gives me all what i want to know about this camera “” They say the GH2 is not a revolution but a very concrete evolution of the GH1 .
cheers next time
Duarte Bruno
3 years ago |This camera is very close to being perfect for me to give a damn about any other right now. The only thing missing for me is IBIS but that’s a Panasonic option and considering that the sensor is even better than the GH1 I think there is no point in waiting for Olympus to come up with an IBIS answer camera.
A concrete evolution from the GH1 is a good description because they have improved almost every aspect they could improve, (well at least the ones that matter the most for a photographer).
This is going to be my next camera, no doubt!
Eric
3 years ago |I’m glad to see they added a leather like texture and finally changed the color of the menu system. Both changes make the camera look more serious than it’s predecessor. Now bring on the pro grade PEN
Lupo
3 years ago |They say that there is less noise (one stop), focuses faster (2 times) and mutch better on the viewfinder
Dun
3 years ago |“GH2 is not a revolution but a very concrete evolution of the GH1″
This says all. GH1 was a revolutionary camera and many people expected GH2 to have a revolutionary feature (a shutterless camera etc.) but GH2 could not keep up the pace. GH2 looks like a tweaked and fixed GH1 with same bells and whistles, some of which are already available (maybe even better) in GH1 via firmware hack.
Frosti7
3 years ago |You cant expect panasonic to reinvent a new product everytime, this is only the second camera and they improved almost on everything, next big think would be shutterless
Tobias W.
3 years ago |If only they had in body IS then I would consider Panasonic. Such a shame…
CallaWolf
3 years ago |Agreed. My grip is too unsteady for lens IS – Oly works perfectly for me.
One gigantic + for Oly
adventsam
3 years ago |No way is in-body IS better than OIS, for video OIS is the only solution and what about the stabilised view with OIS. Get away with you. For the small fl lens the IBIS has no effect anyway.
Duarte Bruno
3 years ago |I’m sorry to say this but I can tell you that IBIS beats ILIS 100% of the times I use it. Why? Because none of my lenses have ILIS – and I’m over a dozen already!
Another thing I can tell you is that for VIDEO a tripod will also beat ILIS 100% of the times.
In the end it’s horses for coarses, it depends on your equipment and the way you set up (or not) your shots.
I prefer IBIS because I have lots of good legacy glass but for video IMHO this issue is almost academic as a steady cam stabilizer or a tripod are a magnitude of order better than any electronic solution.
hd72
3 years ago |I’m in the same boat. I have four manual lenses for my GF1 which could use some stabilization (it can be tough to handhold a 200mm shot). But what especially frustrates me is my other 3 lenses are Panasonic m4/3 — and only one of those has OIS (the 14-140mm).
YouDidntDidYou
3 years ago |I use both Olympus and Panasonic with a variety of lenses and the only time I notice any difference using OIS is when using the Olympus 70-300mm however panasonic have just announced a 100-300mmm with built in stabilization…
Frosti7
3 years ago |Here it goes again, that childlike feeling of wanting a candy
Andrew
3 years ago |Yeah I pretty much want this camera. My only perk is there is no headphone jack.
Gabi
3 years ago |That review looks very good! I guess my G1 has found a worthy successor!
They also said that the first images of the 100-300mm look decent and focussing is pretty fast. The GH2 with the 14-140mm and the 100-300mm will make a fine kit for me!
compositor20
3 years ago |with 20mm f1.7 ibis works !!! i have it in e-p1 and in e-pl1 and without ibis 1/13 is possible in e-p1 and 1/20 in the e-pl1 these are consistent results 75% keepers
if you want safe 90% keepers it more like 1/20 for e-p1 and 1/30 for e-pl1
Miklos Rabi
3 years ago |Hehe… I have 100% keepers with the same lens on GF1. So what?
marilyn
3 years ago |the camera is better than the E5 lol
brian
3 years ago |Unless if you needed a weather-sealed body and/or an OVF, I see no reason to get an E5 over this.
Rocky
3 years ago |Wait for a proper review…
Tom Blue
3 years ago |The E-5 was D.O.A. (Dead on Arrival)…
Jules
3 years ago |What about for anyone having a serious collection of top quality 43 lenses…?
I heard times and again that the Nikon D3x was D.O.A. History proved otherwise.
Jules
3 years ago |where are the complaints about the pixel race now?
Duarte Bruno
3 years ago |Those complains happened (with a valid motive) when the per pixel quality was taking a major dive. This doesn’t seem to be the case. On the contrary!
So, bring the megapixels!(Along with IQ)
Jero
3 years ago |Good heavens, what is this, the “buy an Olympus Epxx club” ?
This is an announcment about a brand new camera that’s not even targeted at the same segment as the compact cams like the EPxx and GF1… Isn’t there somewhere else you can hang out?
Tom
3 years ago |Not targeted at the same segment as the EPx or the GF1? They all share the same lenses & roughly the same sensor size. A viewfinder and a grip doesn’t exactly put this into some drastically different class of consumer. Once you’ve got a collection of lenses, the bodies are what’s now interchangeable.
Jules
3 years ago |the 45-200 on a GF-1 is a greek tragedy. 400mm equivalent shot at arm length using the LCD is fine provided you like soft pictures. I don’t even want to think about the announced 100-300.
The fixed EVF, the grip, the extra weight, those all makes more than a difference.
So, depending on which lens you like, it *is* a different class of consumer.
Tom
3 years ago |Anyone who has to hold a camera “at arm length” to see the LCD screen should consider bifocals.
No, i don’t plan on shooting 400mm handheld on my GF1, but i do consider adding the GH2 to my gear. Got plenty of other lenses that would work great on both cameras.
hd72
3 years ago |The Olympus E-P2 has a really nice quality electronic viewfinder. But you’re right, maybe we should hang out on a different website than you…
http://www.43rumorsAboutCamerasThatDontBeginWithGH.com
tomtnt
3 years ago |Someone help me out. I currently shoot sports with a 7d, 50/1.4 and 70-200/2.8 (indoor sports, dim gyms, fast action)
Can I realistically replace my canon setup and go with the GH2 given the current state of glass? Doesn’t seem that there are any fast enough glass to accomodate indoor sports photography?
Thanks
Boooo!
3 years ago |No.
Alberto
3 years ago |Please, someone know if GH2 can do AF with all 4/3 lens?
I want AF with Zuiko 50mm f2
richard
3 years ago |No, it doesn’t AF most 4/3 lens. Also only few lens can do continous focus, panasonic had no fix that issue or had build in is. Panasonic has nice body but still lack of lens for AF.
Alberto
3 years ago |That´s no very good news, G2 and G10 can do it with zuiko lenses, slowly but…
Gabi
3 years ago |I am pretty sure that the GH2 compatibility with the Zuiko lenses will not be worse than that of the G2.
Ken B
3 years ago |Well it is here now and so far so good, lets hope it gets some goods reviews for IQ.
To tomtnt I hear what your are saying, but your 50mm is 80mm and your 200mm is 320mm with crop factor. Divide the crop result by 2 and your are into M43 lenses, so a 40-150mm F4-5.6 is probably the fastest you will get, and Oly have 50mmf2 scheduled for 2011.
Just not quite up to mark of really fast glass, possibly the pain of having a small size.
GH2 and some wide angle primes that on the way, yeah ha great stuff.
Cheers
Angry Olympus Owner
3 years ago |vertical grip?
dCap
3 years ago |… the good news is that we can go to a Pan body and keep our Oly/Pan lenses
shelly
3 years ago |now that there is a 3d panasonic lenses, they need to make a camera that you can watch your 3d videos on, with your panasonic 3d glasses. just sayin!
yosemite
3 years ago |The GH2 does NOT have true 60fps Full HD video as AVCHD does not support this. Allegedly it DOES record in 60fps though. Is there any forseeable way this camera could be brought to record VIEWABLE 60 fps Full HD through a firmware update or hack? If so, why would Panasonic not include this in the camera from the beginning?
david
3 years ago |“If so, why would Panasonic not include this in the camera from the beginning?”
Encoder can’t keep up? Protecting their dedicated camcorder line? The firmware guy decided to be spiteful? Any reason that anyone gives you will just be pulled out the air since at the moment no one outside of Panasonic knows.
yosemite
3 years ago |I understand, but was also asking if this could be fixed with a firmware upgrade or hack in the future? Does anybody here know how complicated or not this might be?
calxn
3 years ago |Admin, so where is the “surprise” technology that Panasonic was suppose to announce? Nothing surprising so far.
yosemite
3 years ago |It was the 3D lens.
Anyway, given the lack of 60fps recording in Full HD, as far as I can tell the GH2 has no advantages over the GH1, so why would somebody pay twice the price for it? My guess is that this is why they’re only producing 5,000/month, because they’re not sure anybody will fall for the “upgrade”…
Dun
3 years ago |Yeah. As a GH1 owner, I do not think GH2 worths upgrading from GH1, considering the price of GH2. GH2 may be good for people upgrading from other cameras or brands.