<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continually updated -&gt; Panasonic G2 and Panasonic G10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/continually-updated-panasonic-g2-and-panasonic-g10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/continually-updated-panasonic-g2-and-panasonic-g10/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdc</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/continually-updated-panasonic-g2-and-panasonic-g10/comment-page-1/#comment-9500</link>
		<dc:creator>pdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11530#comment-9500</guid>
		<description>The concern about possible/none/some improvement in the G_ sensor is crucial to those of us who bought into 
the Panasonic G system concept early on (October 2008, in my case).
As Kesztio says watch http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Panasonic before 
deciding on these new cameras.  Just hope DxOmark can get sample product to test very soon.
Other than this concern I&#039;ll probably get a G2 as soon as I can.  However, am irked that I am going 
to have to wait &#039;til next winter before I can get a 100-300 zoom.  The 7-14, 14-45 and 45-200  I have are keepers, and the jury is still out on the 14-140 (as on the Leica 14-150) - generally zooms up to 3x or 4x work well over the range, 
but over long ranges optimization means too much compromise at the focal length extremes.  The 14-42 zoom 
is inferior to the 14-45, according to Panasonic&#039;s own MTF charts at http://www.panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/lens/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concern about possible/none/some improvement in the G_ sensor is crucial to those of us who bought into<br />
the Panasonic G system concept early on (October 2008, in my case).<br />
As Kesztio says watch <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Panasonic" rel="nofollow">http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Panasonic</a> before<br />
deciding on these new cameras.  Just hope DxOmark can get sample product to test very soon.<br />
Other than this concern I&#8217;ll probably get a G2 as soon as I can.  However, am irked that I am going<br />
to have to wait &#8217;til next winter before I can get a 100-300 zoom.  The 7-14, 14-45 and 45-200  I have are keepers, and the jury is still out on the 14-140 (as on the Leica 14-150) &#8211; generally zooms up to 3x or 4x work well over the range,<br />
but over long ranges optimization means too much compromise at the focal length extremes.  The 14-42 zoom<br />
is inferior to the 14-45, according to Panasonic&#8217;s own MTF charts at <a href="http://www.panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/lens/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/lens/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/continually-updated-panasonic-g2-and-panasonic-g10/comment-page-1/#comment-9484</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11530#comment-9484</guid>
		<description>@convenience: That&#039;s pretty ridiculous.  No way you can fit a 14-140mm zoom lens onto a four thirds sensor - f/2 at that - and still have it be compact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@convenience: That&#8217;s pretty ridiculous.  No way you can fit a 14-140mm zoom lens onto a four thirds sensor &#8211; f/2 at that &#8211; and still have it be compact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/continually-updated-panasonic-g2-and-panasonic-g10/comment-page-1/#comment-9480</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=11530#comment-9480</guid>
		<description>A little évolution, a entry level camera with a bridge style EVF (nobody notice that the g10 has a 220000 pixel evf ?), fixed screen, a new venus engine, but the same old tires ;). The G2 is a G1 improvment, new engine, same tires, same lcd, but touchcreen, and not a capacitive one. Well, it&#039;s like the other brand, put some new stuff in a very similar body every 6 to 9 month, give a name to the new baby and make a powerful marketing campain, Easy stuff, easy money ;)  Much easier than build new lenses :( Oh yes, i almost forgot, there is a all new mighty 14~45,without the OIS button and a little lighter, but with the same ugly f3.5~f5.6 aperture. On the aps-c side, i can buy a constant f2.8 28~80zoom, a f2.8 wide angle zoom like the tokina one (it seems i must say farewell to the fast wide prime, like the one we found on FF)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little évolution, a entry level camera with a bridge style EVF (nobody notice that the g10 has a 220000 pixel evf ?), fixed screen, a new venus engine, but the same old tires <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . The G2 is a G1 improvment, new engine, same tires, same lcd, but touchcreen, and not a capacitive one. Well, it&#8217;s like the other brand, put some new stuff in a very similar body every 6 to 9 month, give a name to the new baby and make a powerful marketing campain, Easy stuff, easy money <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Much easier than build new lenses <img src='http://www.43rumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Oh yes, i almost forgot, there is a all new mighty 14~45,without the OIS button and a little lighter, but with the same ugly f3.5~f5.6 aperture. On the aps-c side, i can buy a constant f2.8 28~80zoom, a f2.8 wide angle zoom like the tokina one (it seems i must say farewell to the fast wide prime, like the one we found on FF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 501/527 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 04:43:13 -->
