<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China report: Canon and Nikon vs rest of the world.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/china-report-canon-and-nikon-vs-rest-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/china-report-canon-and-nikon-vs-rest-of-the-world/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdc</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/china-report-canon-and-nikon-vs-rest-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-33651</link>
		<dc:creator>pdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4699#comment-33651</guid>
		<description>Daren - you are absolutely right.  225 sq.mm for 43, 864 for 35mm FF, 1452 for on Pentax 645D, 1773 on PhaseOne P65, 1977 for Kodak KAF39000 MF sensor, etc. As in film, the size of your real estate counts.  BUT ... who wants to pack the heavy gear? 
Recently I have been shooting colourful sunrises and the moon phases with a mFT and Nikon 300/2.8 lens, and TC301, as well as the new Panasonic 100-300mm.  The images are great for the sensor but &quot;..the dynamic range and tendency to produce vivid colour fringing in areas of high contrast just cannot be tamed with small sensor cameras&quot; rings so true, and in those situations I lust for at least a Nikon D3. 
I was shooting both G1 and GH2, and can tell you that there is really no gain in sensor and processor performance at the lower ISOs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daren &#8211; you are absolutely right.  225 sq.mm for 43, 864 for 35mm FF, 1452 for on Pentax 645D, 1773 on PhaseOne P65, 1977 for Kodak KAF39000 MF sensor, etc. As in film, the size of your real estate counts.  BUT &#8230; who wants to pack the heavy gear?<br />
Recently I have been shooting colourful sunrises and the moon phases with a mFT and Nikon 300/2.8 lens, and TC301, as well as the new Panasonic 100-300mm.  The images are great for the sensor but &#8220;..the dynamic range and tendency to produce vivid colour fringing in areas of high contrast just cannot be tamed with small sensor cameras&#8221; rings so true, and in those situations I lust for at least a Nikon D3.<br />
I was shooting both G1 and GH2, and can tell you that there is really no gain in sensor and processor performance at the lower ISOs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliephant</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/china-report-canon-and-nikon-vs-rest-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>elliephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4699#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I thought I might get directed to Wukesong.  But are you absolutely sure they have it at Photographic City?  Trips to these markets are so tiring, I&#039;d like to be sure before going.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I thought I might get directed to Wukesong.  But are you absolutely sure they have it at Photographic City?  Trips to these markets are so tiring, I&#8217;d like to be sure before going.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/china-report-canon-and-nikon-vs-rest-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://43rumors.com/?p=4699#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>Hi Ellie!
Go here http://maps.google.com/maps?q=beijing&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=39.917735,116.285219&amp;spn=0.019617,0.045447&amp;z=15
You follow the 4th ring and shortly before the Fucheng Road cross you will see the Beijing Photographic city. But you can also go Zhonguancun! cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ellie!<br />
Go here <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=beijing&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.917735,116.285219&#038;spn=0.019617,0.045447&#038;z=15" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.com/maps?q=beijing&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=39.917735,116.285219&#038;spn=0.019617,0.045447&#038;z=15</a><br />
You follow the 4th ring and shortly before the Fucheng Road cross you will see the Beijing Photographic city. But you can also go Zhonguancun! cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 488/518 objects using xcache

Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2012-02-12 04:40:02 -->
