<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new 35-100mm X lens video user review&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/</link>
	<description>Panasonic and Olympus Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244193</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=34715#comment-244193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[don&#039;t take it too offensive but aren&#039;t you working for Panasonic?
seen some tests where bokeh quality was more like noise pattern just cleared by bad noise ninja blurry settings then a proper creamy smooth bokeh. Even in your samples. 

You are too excited, although I will give this lens a shot. But comapre to pl25 and imo they are 2 worlds in picture rendering. Posting from mobile so excuse me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t take it too offensive but aren&#8217;t you working for Panasonic?<br />
seen some tests where bokeh quality was more like noise pattern just cleared by bad noise ninja blurry settings then a proper creamy smooth bokeh. Even in your samples. </p>
<p>You are too excited, although I will give this lens a shot. But comapre to pl25 and imo they are 2 worlds in picture rendering. Posting from mobile so excuse me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244135</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=34715#comment-244135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used the GH2. I should get my GH3 in about 1 month though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the GH2. I should get my GH3 in about 1 month though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244131</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=34715#comment-244131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244112</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=34715#comment-244112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which body are you using? Oly or Pana?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which body are you using? Oly or Pana?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.43rumors.com/a-new-35-100mm-x-lens-video-user-review/comment-page-1/#comment-244074</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43rumors.com/?p=34715#comment-244074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes it is considering the Sony 16-50 has a wider angle, parafocal, and class leading performance while being sold at $800 new, easily found at $600 used!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is considering the Sony 16-50 has a wider angle, parafocal, and class leading performance while being sold at $800 new, easily found at $600 used!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 29/44 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc
Object Caching 314/343 objects using apc

 Served from: 43rumors.com @ 2013-05-22 07:27:04 by W3 Total Cache -->